English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

...you are probably the type of person who would stand by and watch your sons and daughters get anally raped by Militant Islamists. If it wasn't for the United States, you'd all be wearing Burkas and eating rotten eggs 3 times a day. You people couldn't fight your way out of a paper bag. Get in the game you uneducated losers. Do you deny it?

2006-08-03 05:16:07 · 39 answers · asked by rogue_philosopher_69 1 in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

I've never seen so many uneducated people expressing elementary opinions. Plus, did you people ever learn how to write properly? Get a copy of "Elements of Style" by Strunk & White. Your grammar is deplorable.

2006-08-03 05:39:14 · update #1

39 answers

Right on Brother! I voted for Bush twice and I'd do it again. Thank god we've had a pres who has a pair!

2006-08-03 05:19:56 · answer #1 · answered by marieandlucaspape 3 · 0 5

you don't have to love Bush or his policies to be against terrorism or to be pro-America. Bush totally sucks. His policies are ruining the United States and putting the citizens of his country in harms way. But I think terrorists are cowards and I hope they are all destroyed or converted.

The middle east has not once send an invading army here, so I don't see how we could end up wearing Burkas. Those who came over for 9/11 were terrorists...not representative of their country or their religion. In fact, American policy has disenfranchised so many people around the world, we have actually made recruiting terrorists easier for these fringe groups.

I am not uneducated nor am I a loser, and I suggest that you look in the mirror next time you want to make such blanket assertions.

2006-08-03 05:25:59 · answer #2 · answered by jimvalentinojr 6 · 0 0

Yes, I do deny it. If Iraq had actually had anything to do with 9/11 I would be all for the war there. I was 100% for the invasion of Afghanistan. That's where the Taliban is and they provide support and training for Al qaeda. Al qaeda did not exist in Iraq until they showed up there to fight the American army. Al qaeda wants a theocracy and Saddam Hussein wasn't about to give up his secular dictatorship to a bunch of religious nuts, so Hussein and Osama bin Laden were not exactly on the best of terms. If we had stayed in Afghanistan and/or focused on fighting Al qaeda and other terrorist organizations, I would have been OK with that. Heck, we'd probably have the Taliban wiped out and a really good start on a secular government in Afghanistan if we had kept our focus. Invading Iraq, basically only because Bush wanted to, makes no sense whatsoever, strategically. Saddam Hussein and Iraq were bottled up, they weren't going anywhere. Now, our armed forces are terribly overextended just trying to fight in Iraq. They don't have enough troops to do the job in Afghanistan or against Al qaeda, they're all tied up in Iraq, fighting the terrorists and insurgents that showed up AFTER we invaded Iraq.

2006-08-03 05:27:03 · answer #3 · answered by cool_breeze_2444 6 · 0 0

You’re predicating your position on the view that Islamic extremists have the skill and assets to take over a country. Of course I see nothing from the militant camps that would warrant this conclusion. Prior to Bush and Blair obtaining their respective offices, were we under the command of totalitarian Islamic theocracies? No. The only thing there behavior has done is put more of soldiers in unnecessary danger now, while also galvanizing and emboldening disparate Islamic militant groups into one cohesive unit.

2006-08-03 05:23:48 · answer #4 · answered by Lawrence Louis 7 · 0 0

At first I was going to just monitor this question and observe the anticipated highly charged responses from both sides of the alleged "issue".
It's obvious that rogue_philos... wanted to generate a brouhaha
and is really not interested in anyone's opinion about the implied "issue".
The fact that he or she is monitoring his or her question and adding inciting edits is proof of his motive.
Being critical of the president of the United States is my civic obligation. When taken together with Our Declaration of Independence that duty is implied in the preamble of the Constitution. You need to put down the Strunk and White and pick up a copy of the Constitution and The Declaration of Idependence. Here's a couple of links:
http://lcweb2.loc.gov/cgi-bin/ampage?collId=rbc3&fileName=rbc0001_2004pe76546page.db
http://www.loc.gov/exhibits/treasures/images/s5.6p.1.jpg

Following behind any "leader" and "swallowing" everything offered without "chewing" is not just unhealthy it's plain stupid. Your reference to "you people" whom you claim "couldn't fight your way out of a paper bag" is blatantly inciting and completely beside the point. Then again, you didn't really have a point from the beginning other than to incite.
Didn't your parents teach you anything? You're probably one of those people who looks BOTH ways and watches the traffic lights before crossing a street, right?
Get a clue imbecile, you're supposed to look ALL WAYS and wait on the traffic lights but watch THE CARS!!
Thanks fot the 2 points, Idiot!

inciting edit!
Those last two paragraphs before the "idiot" comment are examples of using metaphors to illustrate a particular point of view.

2006-08-03 06:33:02 · answer #5 · answered by Dahs 3 · 0 0

You sound like your attacking those who are in the US that are against the war on islamic facists. The truth of the matter is, the people in the US has never been forced to wear burkas and they never will be. We may have spanish as the national language in the next 50 years, but no one will be forced to wear burkas.

Think about things before you jump to conclusions.
(if you bring up the thing if it wern't for the US in WW2 then Europe would be speeking German, it's a correct statement)

2006-08-03 05:27:37 · answer #6 · answered by just another consciousness 3 · 0 0

Sure I'm critical of Bush and Blair. I live in an old gritty city near philadelphia so I see plenty of people go to Iraq, or have family go there, and I've thought of it myself a few times, even though I don't support the war. I've also been teaching police officers how to defend themselves since I was 13 years old. I could squeeze you into a paper bag.

What's Ironic is that American soldiers were encouraging rape and sexual mutilation in Iraq. Not to mention I've dated two girls who were raped, both born and raised here. I live in a country that attacks other countries to improve their quality of life and yet I once had so little money that I would have been glad to eat rotten eggs 3 times a day- once just isn't enough.

If it weren't for the United States, muslims would care less about us because we would not be invading their territory. People like you who would bow down and swap off any political leader who waves an American flag claiming to be patriotic are just a bunch of mindless FOX news fans who have a problem of not be able to think outside of the box.

Have you ever put yourself in the shoes of an Islamic radicalist, or even a common muslim of the middle east? In case you've forgotten, this entire dilemna came to be when a western nation became involved in a battle between one of the most powerful muslim theocracies in the middle east and the only SECULAR muslim nation in existance, and then occupied the nation that holds the two most sacred cities of Islam.

Have you ever wondered how many people in the United States live in horrible conditions? Have you ever taken a stroll through places like Camden, Compton, Watts, Oakland, San Jose, Baltimore, the captial city of Washington DC, the Bronx, Jersy city, Newark, Trenton, Philadelphia, this list goes on for quite a while and populations totals up in the millions. Not to mention the thousands of smaller cities and big towns that are just as "ghetto". I live in one, and there are at least 12 others in the state of PA like them, all totaling up to about 3 million, and that's just in PA. What about Michigan, Ohio, Indiana?

I criticize Bush because he does just as good of a job of establishing prosperous lifestyles in the middle east as he does in his own country.

2006-08-03 05:44:51 · answer #7 · answered by Anonimo 5 · 0 0

Yes I do! You are a ****** big headed assHole who thinks to rule the world. Just open your mind dear and read your history books coz you are blabbing without knowing what you are talking about. Have you not yet realized that American people have European origin? Does the name Cristopher Colombo ring a bell to you? Dont you know that the true americans were the American Indians? Now, either shut up or try to get of your dumbness and leave people their right to live independently of any race, religion or any other issue!

2006-08-03 05:23:44 · answer #8 · answered by buxiii 3 · 0 0

First and foremost, you seem to be very critical of the opposition. Maybe you are a bit of a close minded loser yourself. Can't take competition, or maybe you talk of violence due to the fact that you Bushites are intellectually inferior to the liberal who can think for himself.

Lose the brain washing in which you have recieved, and then you can talk about fighting.
That paper bag you speak of seems to have blinded you to the facts of the atrocities in which this Bush Regime has commited.

2006-08-03 05:24:34 · answer #9 · answered by Jason J 2 · 0 0

Yes, I deny all of that.

I believe that George W. Bush and his administration have so spectacularly bungled the invasion of Iraq and subsequent occupation that we have alienated many of the moderate middle eastern citizens who would otherwise have supported us.

And by the way, I may be a lib, but I supported the invasion of Afghanistan 100%, and still do.

2006-08-03 05:20:40 · answer #10 · answered by Brian L 7 · 0 0

Being critical of someone does not mean that you think EVERYTHING that they do is wrong. Being critical means analyzing what they have done and issuing your own opinion. Not many will support everything that Bush has done. I think you have gone a little extreme on your issue here.

I define uneducated as someone who uses extremities such as foul language, insults, and ridiculous situations as a fighting tool instead of real knowledge and facts.

2006-08-03 05:28:17 · answer #11 · answered by Lisa H 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers