There is no such thing. Any dictatorship is dangerous and I can't think of a single one in which the populace is not abused, terrorized, and threatened concerning their personal freedoms. There is no ability to speak freely for one. Every aspect of every citizens lives are regulated, dictated, and monitored. There is no freedom of choice, freedom of speech, freedom of religion (in most cases), freedom of movement in or out of the country.....
There is nothing positive that can be said about a dictatorship. Don't take my word for it. Study it yourself.
2006-08-03 04:29:29
·
answer #1
·
answered by Bubbles 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
That cannot be answered correctly b/c on paper, dictatorships and communism look great, but the idealisms behind them are wrong. You cannot possiblly reason that one person having power over all (such as a dictator) can be better then a gov't where the leaders are elected and possibly removed by the people.
2006-08-03 11:27:59
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
No, it isnt better. Because after a militar goverment the democracy is always weak, it needs time to strengthen. So, it is better to start with a unstable democracy than having 100 years of stable dictorship.
2006-08-03 11:29:46
·
answer #3
·
answered by thor3000 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
i have none
2006-08-03 11:45:05
·
answer #4
·
answered by idontkno 7
·
0⤊
0⤋