Has there ever been non existance? nothingness etc. I think you know what I mean. I really don't think there could be any evidence.
2006-08-03 03:53:22 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Science & Mathematics ➔ Other - Science
Yes, it's called Love Island.
2006-08-03 03:57:44 · answer #1 · answered by Stammerman! 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't think that there has ever been a scientific proof for the existence of anything. that is not the job of science. I don't think there is even a universally accepted definition of existence.
I think that nothingness does not exist in our Universe, which always contains something, though it is sometimes rather sparse.
Nothingness or non existence should rather be considered as philosophical or even religious concepts. It might be considered as the source from which all came and to which all will return. To this extent it is outside the scope of Physical reality, and not amenable to scientific study.
2006-08-04 04:24:16 · answer #2 · answered by hi_patia 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Actually, you don't need impressive maths skills - it can't be proved, can it, no matter what maths level you are at?
Does "Nothingness" exist in space? I'm not sure. Einsteins aetherial Cosmological Constant ("[his] greatest ever mistake") predicted that some sort of invisible aether existed in space to compensate for the lack of mass in the known universe, which in turn supports the Big Bang theory.
Nothingness and Existence: are they mutually exclusive? Mathematically, they are not. Physically, I'm not sure.
2006-08-03 04:48:15 · answer #3 · answered by David R 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
kind of be an oxymoron of mamoth proportions if there was evidence, now wouldn't it. And here you see a picture of nothing, taken from nowhere, by nobody, at no time.
Seriously, check into what Stephen Hawking has to say on the matter. To truly understand it all you need enormous math skills, but he's pretty good at putting things into words, conceptualizing for us mere mental mortals.
2006-08-03 03:59:31 · answer #4 · answered by Alobar 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Space is filled with non existence.
Its relative of course but mostly nothing exists
there.
2006-08-03 03:58:57 · answer #5 · answered by Rob G 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I guess the real evidence is nonexistant too.
2006-08-03 03:58:23 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
if evidence existed, the non-existence would exist.
2006-08-04 02:24:23 · answer #7 · answered by zinc 1977 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yah! just said Hello,Pilgrim.
2006-08-03 15:18:30 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋