Al Gore is better than a sedative!
2006-08-03 02:59:46
·
answer #1
·
answered by rosi l 5
·
2⤊
3⤋
On the contrary it may not have been that boring as we watched the terrorists attack again and again while Al Bore was trying to glad hand with the UN and make up his own mind on how to find and defeat "ManBearPig". When the guy lost he became a fat drunk who sat around in his drawers, and when he first reappeared on the scene, he was wearing a Brown suit in nearly every shot that looked like the Sallvation Army had given it to him! What an idiot, fat, dull and dangerous!
What don't you think all of the attacks we would have had to suffer would not have been a LOT of excitement? Al Bore is and always will be a LOSER! We might all be Muslims or dead by now if he had gotten elected!
I do see a trend in the Democrat Partys' strategy though, always nominate the least acceptable candidate, and hope they lose the election so the Democrats can whine endlessly about the way things are. I don't even think they have been truly serious in the last two elections and if they nominate Hilary for their candidate this next time around I think I will have to rest my case on that one, because it's proof that I am RIGHT!
The Democrats don't want to win, they want to lose and accuse!
2006-08-03 11:08:51
·
answer #2
·
answered by ruthie_msw 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
That would have been a dangerous administration. Oh, I would have nightmares about that. Thank goodness, Mr. Gore didn't win, and thank goodness the flip-flopper Mr. Kerry didn't win either!
It's unfortunate that President Bush lacks the charisma and orator qualities as the aforementioned Democrats, or Billy Clinton who can sell ice to the Askimos (President Bush more down-to-earth, unpolitical-like behavior has alienated leaders of other countries who are stuck in their own situation and are such prudes). Despite the horrible disasters and situation the U.S. has been in the last 6 years, the Administration has been able get out of recession into a robust and growing economy. Yet, polls reflect that people don't sense that. I blame that on the lack of PR by the current Administration. The reality is that this Administration has been able to do the impossible by keeping the U.S. growing and strong for years to come.
2006-08-03 10:04:20
·
answer #3
·
answered by EDDie 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
1.) A Gore administration would have made sure that the Tech industries kept their promise to keep people employed in the post Y2K environment.
2.) The attack of 9/11 would have occurred anyway.
3.) We would have addressed the Taliban training bases in Afghanistan, and put more pressure on Pakistan to clean up their side of the border.
4.) We would not have gone into Iraq.
5.) We would not have alienated the global community.
6) We would not have the debt we not have.
7.) We would be focusing on our contributions to the Global Warming issues.
8.) The Rabid Religious Right would still be hounding the Democrats.
2006-08-03 10:24:57
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Even if he had won I doubt it would have stopped 911 from happening. Although I doubt we would have kicked the Taliban out of power in Afghanistan.
The business sector would have still tanked but I don't know if Gore would have pushed for the stimulious necessary for it to have recovered as fast as it did.
Deficits may or may not have been the problem they are. We'd probably not have national health care.
Saddam would still be killing people in Iraq and still backing groups like Hamas and Hezbollah.
Israel would probably be attacking Hezbollah in Lebanon and gas prices would still be as high as they are now.
And global warming would still be happening.
In short probably not a lot of things would be different that really matter. And Oh Yeah we'd be bored. The Democrats couldn't be bitching about the President. And people like KooKooBananas would have to find another topic to be ignorant about.
2006-08-03 10:10:18
·
answer #5
·
answered by namsaev 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
We can't change history . Wouldn't it have been nice to have it a little boring about now and the government running smoothly and peace in the world . Instead of what we have ( wars) , all this anger and hate with each other . If you really want to know , what G W Bush has and has not done to and against this country , go to :www,whoradio .com click on Steve Deace - August 1 , 2006 , get in on the discussion . He has the truth , check it out .
As far as the kind of President , we might have had , well we don't know , but we do know what kind of one we got @#%$^&*&^@#$*& thats all I'm going to say about that !!!
2006-08-03 10:12:31
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
The aftermath of 911 would have been completely different and Gore probably would not have alienated the international arena like Bush has.
2006-08-03 10:01:49
·
answer #7
·
answered by Double 709 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Take a good look at who you voted for! I am not saying Gore would have been better at all ! Bush has done so much damage to the USA it will take decades to repair. Repub or Dem we need someone who will do what is right for all of us not just their party !!!
2006-08-03 10:04:34
·
answer #8
·
answered by jdfnv 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Hmmm ... the only bad thing I could see in such a proposition is that the late-night talk show writers would actually have had to work instead of just rolling raw tapes of Bush.
2006-08-03 10:01:20
·
answer #9
·
answered by wmp55 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
More like Al Bore!! You are right. I would have had to move to Canada to avoid lapsing into a coma every time he gave a speech!
2006-08-03 10:03:35
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋