English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-08-03 02:08:55 · 25 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

25 answers

The United Nations will not allow them to take control of another country.

2006-08-03 02:12:30 · answer #1 · answered by Elite117 3 · 0 0

One of the reasons that the USA has not invaded Iran or North Korea is that the US military is getting dangerously overstretched.
While they may be the world's only superpower at the moment they do not have access to unlimited resources and manpower. In North Korea I cannot see the Chinese taking too kindly to US troops perched on their border. If Iran were invaded the entire Muslim world, and that includes Saudi Arabia, would have no option but to support the the Iranians. While the Pentagon may have contingency plans for such eventualities I cannot see the USA invading either country in the near future.

2006-08-03 10:15:19 · answer #2 · answered by sleepyredlion 4 · 0 0

Although a number of americans think that the U.S. is the greatest nation in the world, and is self-sufficient.
The U.S. population has just topped 300 million. The world has over 6 Billion population. The U.S. is a small part of the world.
It has great power because of money, but it still relies heavily on many other countries for certain things.
If they started invading other countries. The rest of the world would see that as oppressive and aggressive, and would stop exports to the U.S.
The world does not belong to the United States. The United States belongs to the United States.
It's a bit like your neighbour extending his garden into yours and putting a fence up.
I know I wouldn't take too kindly to that, and I'm sure the other neighbours would be opposed to it too.

2006-08-03 09:18:41 · answer #3 · answered by JeffE 6 · 0 0

1. Too many countries will opose the USA.
2. THey hav too much problems in Iraq. With the unrest goin on and the killings all over Iraq, they can't afford another disaster in NK or Iran.
3. Invading NK would mean the distruction of SK. Cause NK has loads of artilerry directed towards SK.
4. There's no oil in NK.
5. Israel will attack Iran first b4 the Americans will join in the fray.
6. Not much gain in invading countries. Its better for them to destroy a country and leave it be. Eg Vietnam.

2006-08-03 09:19:32 · answer #4 · answered by avatar 1 · 0 0

Quite honestly, scared might not be the word, but they would certainly cause much more loss of life. Also, Hussein was committing genocide. He was killing his own people by the thousands, which I don't believe is going on in Iran. Plus, even with current problems, Iran and N Korea have been somewhat more reasonable, at least not declaring war on the US openly like Saddam was known to do. Just because one issue is the same with three countries doesn't mean they pose the same "problems".

2006-08-03 09:19:21 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

N.Korea. Why bother? They are not a real enemy its just business. Its like Cuba and the cold war with the soviets.

Now Iran yes. They are the real enemy to western civilisation at the moment. Under the current leadership in Iran there WILL BE war at some stage. As they are all so keen to die for Islam I say lets help them. NUKE THEM and be done with the scum.

2006-08-03 10:07:15 · answer #6 · answered by Jack 3 · 0 0

clearly most of you missing 1 vital fact of this question"why doesn't U.S.A invade IRAN or N.KOREA(r u scared?)?.
the question is not how much pain you would like to be inflicted on them. as far as i am concered north korea have the 2nd bigest army in the world and america have the first bigest army and clearly iran,lebonon and afganistan have not even got an army which can be declared a big.however iraq and afganistan have got oil which many people or shall i say continents are after?so please thoose of you who are replying to this answer please read it clearly. thank you

2006-08-03 10:22:57 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

2,500 US soldiers have died in Iraq; Americans are counting their casualties and are still in that country without any timetable to withdraw its troops. Americans at home are making themselves heard about their dissent to this ongoing war.

If there are no immediate dangers threatening America or regions where the US has vested interests, it would be pure military adventurism to invade either of the two country - the toll to human lives on both sides would be unbearably high.

The men and women in the US armed forces are among the most courageous, most effective fighting forces in the world - this is unquestionable.

2006-08-03 09:25:40 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Iraq and Afghanistan were not exactly hard countries to invade but as far as Iran is concern we would incur heavy losses trying to invade them, and as for north Korea , history teaches us that countries with nukes dint get invaded.

2006-08-03 09:39:17 · answer #9 · answered by hawkeyes 3 · 0 0

give it time its all part of a major plan,japan/sk/oz/nz/sa will kick off with the usa against nk,india will kick off against pakistan,china will plough the american money they have been given and take over africa,and the little states in russia will become a real problem for the russians,and american money will support them,but still they will vote in the scum.these ceasefires are just so forces can be moved in for the big push,the jews well they just up for kicking any arab ***,turkey/Saudi/Oman,will bring pressure to bear on Iran,Afghanistan,will be laid waste.and civil war will rage in the middle east

2006-08-04 04:59:53 · answer #10 · answered by archaeologia 6 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers