the topic is "an unstable democracy is better than a stable dictatorship" and im speaking for the motion. so got any ballistic points, anyone???
2006-08-03 00:59:55 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous in Education & Reference ➔ Primary & Secondary Education
think about the Common Good
"a democracy of one person is no democracy at all"
2006-08-03 01:05:43 · answer #1 · answered by Molly R 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i would go for an unstable democracy over a dictatorship any day..i do not think that one person should have complete control even if it causes some stability in government..i believe a dictatorship would eventually led to the downfall of the country,...i think unstability is a common thing among democracy because it is always changing...and if something is not a constant than it can't be considered stable...a democracy is considered unstable because the people have a voice in the matter and the peoples opinions are always differenr thus causing an ever changing state...
2006-08-03 08:05:55 · answer #2 · answered by EvEl_LiL_kArEbEaR 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I go for a stable dictatorship because an unstable democrasy is a free-for-all show with everyone crying rights and freedom to do as they damn well please with no concern for the consequences of their actions.
2006-08-03 08:05:00 · answer #3 · answered by Equinox 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Proper grammar, seriously. It's not 'I got my debate tomorrow'. It's 'I have a debate tomorrow'. People are more willing to listen seriously to someone who's speech is correct.
Good luck.
2006-08-03 08:04:46 · answer #4 · answered by FaerieWhings 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋