i think not
2006-08-02 20:41:26 · 26 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports ➔ Wrestling
I THINK THE UNDERTAKER (THE DEAMAN) IS BETTER
2006-08-02 21:04:47 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The Great khali .Many say that khali is not a good wrestler because his legs are stiff and he can't move.But it is what God gave him.It is common that small wrestlers like Rey do more jumps and as the size increases these tricks disappears.same
is the case with The Great khali.And about the finisher 'boot to head' even Undertaker and Kane use this shot and they have won several matches like this.Then why blame only The Great Khali.Anyway I am with The Great khali
2006-08-03 02:18:05 · answer #2 · answered by Sagittarian 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Khali has a lot more advantage when it comes to size. This doesn't mean that I am a fan of Khali.
2006-08-03 03:09:16 · answer #3 · answered by peterboro_first 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes, undertaker has stood the test of time, he has been in wwe for 16 years. He can do just about anything in the ring. Khali has limited mobility, he has never leaped over the top rope. Undertaker is the best big man in the business, ever. No one has stayed longer or, been more popular with the fans in that amount of time.
2006-08-03 02:24:34 · answer #4 · answered by bundynomics 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Everybody is better than the great khali
2006-08-03 10:21:49 · answer #5 · answered by tyrone b 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If we look in terms of raw strength and power Khali is way better than taker But if we look at in ring performing capabilities taker is miles ahead
2006-08-03 01:29:43 · answer #6 · answered by amandeep s 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
maybe the undertaker is more better than khali because the great khali was blunt
2006-08-02 20:55:59 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Of course Khali can defeat Undertaker anyday anytime....and by the way he is an Indian like me!!!!!
Proud to be an Indian!!!!!
2006-08-02 22:53:12 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
If you asked me a few years ago i would say yes but he has slowed down,i dont think its his age i think its his gimmick(dead man walking and all that bollocks).I think Khali is the new big thing in perfessional wrestling.
2006-08-03 03:27:11 · answer #9 · answered by HHH 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
undertaker is better since he didn't need any help from any body he is a single person. he can win khali
2006-08-02 21:48:11 · answer #10 · answered by raja 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
KHALi is Best..........he had beaten Undertaker's As$ Twice.......
2006-08-02 22:00:31 · answer #11 · answered by ☼ Magnus ☼ 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋