good point
2006-08-02 20:31:08
·
answer #1
·
answered by jackdensu 1
·
3⤊
1⤋
Brilliant question!
Of course, you are right. I guess we all want a scapegoat.
On a deeper level, though, I think many feel angst over the state of the world and want things to improve. We also feel powerless to do much that will result in tangible improvements. So, we vent our frustration by throwing blame around. Depending on our perspecitve, we find people whose views conflict with ours and throw our blame at them.
2006-08-02 20:33:00
·
answer #2
·
answered by Rory McRandall 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Effed up world?
It's a great world. Yeah, there's a lot of ugly crap happening, but eliminating all bad things is not just impossible--it'd be contradictory. The bad is needed to appreciate the good.
Don't just whine about it. Try to be happy, it's the best you can do.
2006-08-02 20:36:27
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
finding out to kill off human beings we believe to no longer be worth to society won't be logical in any respect. At what factor do you return to a decision the shrink off on properly worth is? to boot, the call for good judgment isn't a call for a society that's outfitted around a chilly equation finding out what to be performed in the international should be performed with maximized earnings to the international. to boot, i will see illogical arguments to each thought you proposed. Fro occasion, nationalize the globe and extract components? feels like a large thank you to hasten the pollution on earth and destabilize the economies of the international. Kill of the unhealthiest human beings? How do you outline undesirable? Stephen Hawkins isn't very healthful yet his contributions to the international are large. Your concepts are no longer logical in any respect so attempting your attempt to demonize good judgment should not be triumphant. What atheists mean by using good judgment is common reasoning in accordance with information. we seem to the claims of the international. there are various claims that are fake. We reject lots of them with the aid of fact they have not have been given any foundation in certainty. in spite of the incontrovertible fact that, a lot of human beings decide for to offer their faith a loose bypass on being examined like this.
2016-10-01 10:17:48
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
It begins with one.Each of us has a responsibility to ourselves and the world to hold ourselves and those we elect or otherwise allow into power accountable for their actions supposedly on the behalf of the people.Be the change. Peace.
2006-08-02 20:37:32
·
answer #5
·
answered by wildrover 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
It is easier to blame another than to admit fault and work together.
2006-08-02 20:34:40
·
answer #6
·
answered by 006 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
no, the problem comes from all of us not one person is to balme fo rit or one specific group, we all contribute to the worlds loss
2006-08-02 20:31:55
·
answer #7
·
answered by Chi-Master-N-May 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I THINK THAT IT MAKES SIMPLE MINDED PEOPLE FEEL BETTER TO JUSTIFY REASON IN THIS MANNER.
2006-08-02 20:36:01
·
answer #8
·
answered by Work-N-Hrd-2-Mk-It 4
·
0⤊
0⤋