I'm posting here instead of the religion category, hoping to find more thoughtful answers. Personally, I don't believe in any God(s), but many people do. I am guessing that you must assume God is timeless, due to the nature of the being, so S/He is not part of our Universe. Do you have any ideas as to how you could go about proving that God exists using any current theories in Cosmology, such as Multiverses, String Theory, M-Theory, etc?
2006-08-02 17:58:11 · 11 answers · asked by powhound 7 in Science & Mathematics ➔ Physics
Once upon a time, 20 billions of years ago, all matter
(all elementary particles and all quarks and
their girlfriends- antiparticles and antiquarks,
all kinds of waves: electromagnetic, gravitational,
muons… gluons field ….. etc.) – was assembled in a “single point”.
It is interesting to think about what had surrounded the “single point”.
The answer is :
EMPTINESS- NOTHING….!!!
Ok!
But why does everyone speak about EMPTINESS- NOTHING in
common phrases rather than in specific, concrete terms?
I wonder why nobody has written down this EMPTINESS- NOTHING in
the form of a physical formula ? You see, every schoolboy knows that
is possible to express the EMPTINESS- NOTHING condition
by the formula T=0K.
* * *
Once there was a “Big Bang”.
But in what space had the Big Bang taken place
and in what space was the matter of the Big Bang distributed?
Not in T=0K?
It is clear, that there is only EMPTINESS, NOTHING, in T=0K.
Now consider that the Universe, as an absolute frame of reference is
in a condition of T = 2,7K (rests relic radiation of the Big Bang ).
But, the relic radiation is extended and in the future will change and decrease.
What temperature can this radiation reach?
Not T=0K?
Hence, if we go into the past or into the present or into the future,
we can not escape from EMPTINESS- NOTHING T=0K.
Therefore it is necessary to begin to think from T=0K.
2006-08-02 19:45:02 · answer #1 · answered by socratus 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Some eternal existence possessing infinite power (God) must exist in order for the Big Bang to happen at all. Some scientists look upon the Big Bang event as nothing more than an accident, but even then there has to be some "thing" that made such an accident possible.
2006-08-03 01:58:30 · answer #2 · answered by Chug-a-Lug 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
There is nothing to say that nothing existed in any form before the big bang. The big bang is simply an event which it's believed the current incarnation of the universe came about. We cannot say for certain whether or not anything existed in any form (places included) before that.
Science does not strive to prove or disprove the existance of a god. It is a bit like trying to prove that a place exists which cannot be mapped in relation to any location, and which is completely isolated from any other place in every physical respect.
2006-08-04 00:11:46 · answer #3 · answered by minuteblue 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't know a lot about String Theory, but I read an article recently regarding how String Theory may suggest that our Universe did not begin with a "Big Bang" but rather it is a type of space that exists alongside gazillions of other spaces and that we can not detect those because they exist alongside ours but in different dimensions. And that our Universe may have occurred as a result of a collision between two of these already existing spaces.
But still, something must have created what exists.
2006-08-03 01:07:31 · answer #4 · answered by rj 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Like Carl Sagan said "Instead of saying that the universe was created by God and God always existed. Why not just save an intellectual step and assume the universe just always existed."
2006-08-03 01:13:48 · answer #5 · answered by isaac a 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
In Christianity, God exists outside of space and time. So, "before or after the Big Bang" has no relevance on the existence of God. Asking "where" also has no meaning since we define "where" within our understanding of space and time which God exists outside of.
2006-08-03 01:30:48 · answer #6 · answered by Foo 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Racine Wisconsin.
2006-08-03 01:30:19 · answer #7 · answered by Shag 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It is a waste of time to mix science and theology.
These areas of human inquiry are mutually incompatible. Oil and water, don't you know...
;-D Can you prove science exists in outer space, where no humans live?
2006-08-03 01:05:47 · answer #8 · answered by China Jon 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
those theories are irrelevant if considering God. They define the exact opposite of any type of Deity.
2006-08-03 01:04:02 · answer #9 · answered by pjordan1182 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
it seems that more and more physicists are saying that the quantum world as we know it, is more and more like a thought, the question then needs to be asked who's thought is it?
2006-08-03 03:24:25 · answer #10 · answered by tkw2201 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋