Man charged in Seattle Shooting Rampage:
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060802/ap_on_re_us/seattle_shooting
Nooooooo, it wasn't a terrorist. Of course not. It was just a guy fed up with America's treatment of Muslims. Never mind we have gone out of our way to NOT profile the members of this planet responsible for most of the hot wars and attrocities against humanity. Never mind we send millions to Palestine, whose populace would want nothing more than to see a sea of dead Americans. Never mind we help Pakistan neutralize India, or it would be turned into a one big glass bowl.
NOOOOOOOO, it was just a simple Pakistani who suffered so much in our country and a cold falafel set him off.
2006-08-02 16:09:09 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Maybe if ppl like you would stop dictating to everybody else how they are suppose to live, act and be in general, then maybe ppl would not resort to violence to have a voice.
This is the exact mentality that got us in what will soon be WW3. Bush was told by many historians that instead of trying to FORCE democracy on the middle east with cowboy diplomacy, that instead he should look at what part we were playing to make them hate us so much. He chose to be the bully and has thereby created more ppl who hate us and would die to see us dead than could ever be imagined.
2006-08-02 16:21:49 · answer #1 · answered by BeachBum 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
The definition of the word "terrorist" has become Orwellian, in that along with its original meaning (someone who commits a crime with the intention of intimidating or coercing societies or governments) it's applied to anyone who commits a heinous crime and who is a Muslim.
He was a crazy, murderous f*ck.
2006-08-02 16:15:22 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I have the perfect rehabilitation for him.
1. Take to Disneyland.
2. Strap him in one of the boats on the "It's a small world" ride.
3. Let him go round and round and round until the war on terror is finished.
2006-08-02 16:21:00 · answer #3 · answered by SPLATT 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Pathetic isn't it. Person above me gave the best definition for terrorist. At least in the media's eyes, it is true.
How many people won't answer your question because they don't know who Orwell was?
2006-08-02 16:18:28 · answer #4 · answered by Salem 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
So how does America treat muslims? And what is a falafel?
2006-08-02 16:18:39 · answer #5 · answered by Huevos Rancheros 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
well, this is an *odd* question.
there is nothing "orwellian" about this particular "control of language".
if anything, it was a lame and clearly propaganda-ish piece.
2006-08-02 16:20:05 · answer #6 · answered by innabobolina 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Nice...
2006-08-02 16:14:32 · answer #7 · answered by Woz 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋