What are your thoughts on Hillary running for President?

Question

Would you vote for her? The economy is in the toilet and during the Clinton years it was the best in a great many years. Can she and hubby bring it back to the money making stage it was in then?

Answer 1

I think that it is an excellent idea.America needs a lady President and she is probably the best candidate for the job.History shows us many successful Presidents and Prime Ministers who could do the job and sometimes better then men.Indra Ghandi, Margret Thacher,Golda Meir,Bhutto and many others.I also think American who will bring about better policies for the world.George Bush has done such a terrible job and America, I think to the rest of the world has become an oppressor of democracy-Egypt,Saudi Arabia and Jordon...these policies will all go when there is a woman at the top.I hope that Hilliary Clinton will steer American to its past greatness and probably raise it higher.Hate to see a great country fall from its previous high standards of equality, human rights inter alia.

Answer 2

Well not sure whose finicial reports you are reading but the economy is doing great, down alittle last three months but the last 6 years have beaten Clintons by leaps and bounds, Bush should be wearing a cape to leap those records.
Unemployment has improved/

And there was really a slight recession during Clintons, so we most certainly don't want that.

next she is not even fully supported by her own party due to her beliefs.

So she would lose full support of her party, lose the real liberal side of the party since Clinton did little for the fringe groups while he was President. She will lose those that don't want a women president and will not get any of the other party since she still stands for too liberal even for those that would want a women.

I could see her as a serious VP if she could accept that but I doubt if she would.

Her running in my opinion would be the best thing that could happen to the Republican party since it would divide the other party and allow them to win on what will still be a very close election again.

They need another Southern Democrat to be a threat, someone like Carter that can pull in the religious vote, the mid line liberal, and lose the fringe liberals ( but since they have no other liberal to vote for may vote for them anyway, but they are not a serious vote block anyway)

Answer 3

Let her run. It is a free country so far. No I wouldn't vote for her. You are giving credit to the wrong people for the economy. It looked like the best until the artifical turf it was standing on gave out and then we find out how rotten it was. If you really want to give credit where credit is do why not give the credit to Reagon instead of Clinton after all Clinton was basking in someone else's glory. The economy is not in the toilet right now until you want to believe the propoganda your fellow liberals are spouting so they can try to take over Congress and the presidency.

Answer 4

Hillary for President ? No way would I vote for her.
The economy was great because the Republican party was the majority in Congress. They should get the credit for a great economy not Bill (I never had sex with that woman) Clinton.

Answer 5

I would vote for Bill Clinton again, but not Hillary. She seems to be wooing the conservatives these days, which is a sign that she can change her mind when it is politically expedient. We need a refreshing, honest, experienced and intelligent candidate, who has some understanding of economics and experience with foreign policy - and no black sheep in his/her closet. Personally, I favored Bill Bradley, but I guess he wasn't photogenic enough or something like that. Also, I don't want Hillary to run, because she will lose. The Republicans want her to run.

Answer 6

Wow where to start! No, I wouldn't vote for her. The Clintons had nothing to do with the economic boom of the 90s. Start with Alan Greenspan, Congress, dot coms, and the like. No President has control of the economy (never have). Based on that assumption then Reagan was responsible for the economic boom of the 80s and Carter was responsible for the fall of the 70s. Maybe you should re-exam your point next time.

Answer 7

No! Please, don't give these people credit for a policy that went south (NAFTA) after most country's realized it wasn't working for them. And, now we have a political nightmare on our hands with country's that hate the US over this debacle.

People like you make asinine remarks about things you know very little about. Bil Clinton will go down in history as one of the worst presidents this country has ever had. His "do nice" policy with the likes of Kim Jong Il, and Osama bin Ladin, Boris Yeltsin, and a host of others, has done so much harm to the security of this country that the full damage may never be known.

His policy as president of not meeting with the CIA director and the FBI, on a regular basis, can be looked at, and should be looked at, as the most serious breech for national security.

The man and the women were absolute trailer trash when it comes to a reasonable discription of their time in office. And, you want to bring back this scum? You have got to be out of your f ucking mind!

Answer 8

for your information the clintons handed President Bush a recession. We were officially in a recession in the fall of 2000, During Clintons administration was when the massive decline started in the manufacturing sector to off shore. Check it out it's easy to find. I want no part of any clinton in that white house.
Why do you think we can no longer drive in front of the white house. Because of clinton. Hell he had a guy try to get him with a plane. I want that white trash group of criminal liars to rot in hell.

Answer 9

let her run.
i'm not sure i'd vote for her - would depend who ran against her. i am not loyal to any party i vote for the person i find most trustworthy and honest.

as for the economy i think that goes in cycles no matter who is in office - though it tends to be worse when we have folks in office who care more about themselves than those they lead - the clintons know what to expect from the opposition and that could be a plus.

Answer 10

I would vote for her. She spent a lifetime living and breathing politics and law. Unfortunately most of the men in this country and their submissive wives are not ready for such a mind blowing change. As far as her being a "big Republican", not true. She was raised in a Republican home and did register as one right out of high school. Soon after entering college she discovered she and her ideals for politics were Democrat.