hell NO!!!! never, never, never...i'll stick with being an adult and having sex!!!
2006-08-02 12:52:33
·
answer #1
·
answered by irishmomof3 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Heck no. Anyway, i think i gave up sex when i became a mother. There's just no time left in the day after dealing with the house and the kids. i would however give up something to be a no-responsiblities teenager with all the time in the world to have sex with my (now) husband again....
2006-08-02 12:54:26
·
answer #2
·
answered by Cyndi Storm 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
While I wouldn't list sex as one of the five most important things in my life, I wouldn't give it up to become a child again. I had a good childhood for the most part, so I don't feel the need to relive it.
2006-08-02 12:52:33
·
answer #3
·
answered by just4funyall 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Kind of an odd choice...but I'd say no. But only because I wouldn't want to relive my childhood again. For two reasons, one:it was too difficult and painful the first time. And two: by going back I risk changing who I am today...and I would never do that.
2006-08-02 13:23:46
·
answer #4
·
answered by ShellRe' 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Not sure there's anything I would do to go back and be a kid again. I'm just fine as an adult, thank you. And certainly would not give up sex.
2006-08-02 12:52:28
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I can have both with my husband lol! I act like a kid around him, and I don't have to give up sex haha
2006-08-02 12:53:19
·
answer #6
·
answered by superboredom 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Why would I have to give up sex.I had plenty of it when I was a kid.And I ain't talking about with adults either.Oh to be a kid again.
2006-08-02 12:55:46
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
i would go back to being a kid so that way i can grow up again and have that much more sex.
2006-08-02 12:54:20
·
answer #8
·
answered by wolf 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
I would like to go back and re-live my 20's with all of the wisdom and experience that I have now.
2006-08-02 12:56:10
·
answer #9
·
answered by Barbara M 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
i don't understand the early onset of the menstrual cycle in any respect. it quite is risky to have infants in young ones. i don't think of i visit permit a newborn stress a automobile at 8 or 9 in simple terms because of the fact they have a desire to. they are unable to dealing with the intrinsic duty. in simple terms as a 12 year previous isn't waiting to handle the duty of a newborn. i'm sorry that fogeys attempt to deter this interest by using performing love it quite is evil, i think of they are attempting to guard their infants as appropriate as they comprehend how. mom and dad might desire to attempt to instill self administration, because of the fact as you have observed, human desire to do issues in the previous they are waiting. returned, while you at the instant are not waiting, emotionally, to handle a newborn or an abortion, don't have intercourse. start administration is fallible. intercourse is a elementary desire, and we are pushed to procreate. yet we don't might desire to be controlled by using that desire.
2016-12-11 05:30:27
·
answer #10
·
answered by ? 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
thats a very good question and yahoo should give u 10 points for asking it. but i really dont know which i would choose since i'm still a virgin.
2006-08-02 12:56:54
·
answer #11
·
answered by ~~SUGAR*LIPS~~ 2
·
0⤊
0⤋