Why should criminals have all the resources of the law at their disposal to defend them in court. Obviously, where there is doubt about their guilt, they should have a defence but in many cases there is not doubt about thier guilt, but it still has to be proved in court.
2006-08-02 10:49:34 · 11 answers · asked by David74 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
i agree
2006-08-02 10:53:18 · answer #1 · answered by idontkno 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
who's Libs? Is she, like, meant to be an authority on Sharia regulation or something? Addendum: yet, yeah, i'm conscious of the cesspool of normal human rights abuses it extremely is the midsection East, and distinctive different places spanning the globe. The Islamic worldwide grow to be the top of enlightened and state-of-the-paintings subculture for hundreds of years... until with regard to the turn of the 2d Millennium. it extremely is while the non secular fundamentalists took over and plunged the finished midsection East right into a gloomy age of scientific lack of understanding and social conservatism that has lasted one thousand years. in assessment to ecu society throughout the Enlightenment, which prospered as end results of the liberation from Church authority, the sunrise of recent technological understanding, and the resulting upward push and adoption of secular, liberal Western values, the cultures of the midsection jap international locations, regrettably, have yet to claw their way out of the pit.
2016-12-14 18:22:21 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i agree... Trial by jury should only be done where there is innitial doubt in the evidence. Thing is though, if the police bring forward a case before the court - how do you know that it's rock solid?
2006-08-02 11:05:05 · answer #3 · answered by an5200 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Some erroneously think that prisons are for protecting citizens and punishing the criminals they aren't, they for protecting the criminals from the citizens otherwise it would actually be punishment instead a hotel/retreat. Its too bad it takes criminals to make prison a bad place...
2006-08-02 10:59:07 · answer #4 · answered by Archer Christifori 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You support the stripping of rights until YOU break the law and start screaming for a lawyer.
2006-08-02 10:54:56 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
We have to have a due process otherwise the whole thing falls apart.
What if someone kidnapped your mother and told you, "Rob this bank or she dies."?
I bet you would want all the rights you could get your hands on.
2006-08-02 10:55:04 · answer #6 · answered by DannyK 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
don't worry, that will change when the camps get opened. you are guaranteed a place for anything you do. read the patriot act and see how it will work!
2006-08-02 10:55:12 · answer #7 · answered by de bossy one 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If we didn't have rights then we would have only laws????? Also if you don't want a trial you don't have to one. NEVER discard your rights!
2006-08-02 10:58:05 · answer #8 · answered by Tiffany Nicole 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
That's the way our system works. Would you rather have summary executions?
2006-08-02 10:52:54 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
i agree with you.
as soon as they're found guilty, all their rights & freedoms should be GONE.
2006-08-02 10:53:03 · answer #10 · answered by veevee 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋