I would get out of Europe. Drop the human rights laws that dont work. Make sure that the crime is punished. Bring back deterents like Borstal and hanging. Take VAT of everything. Then put back a purchase tax. If you girls need a sanitary towel no tax. If you want a Bentley big tax. Get matron back to run hospitals not 100's of accountants. There is a lot more. Immigration has to be stopped for 5 years so we can sort the mess out. Let teachers deal with naughty kids. You can put your own bits in if you want. Lets face it Blair, Brown and Cameron will continue to C**K it up.
2006-08-02 10:47:18 · 13 answers · asked by deadly 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Government
I agree with just about everything you have said.
I can't believe other people on this site have condemned your question, end of the day if things had stayed the way they were years ago we wouldn't be in this mess now!!!!!!!!!!!!
2006-08-02 11:04:54 · answer #1 · answered by MoJoJoJo 4 · 6⤊ 1⤋
Europe went wrong when people started to see it as anything more than a free trade and migration area.
Ask anyone in the criminal justice field about deterence and whether it works or not. They will all tell you the same thing - that it doesn't work. Why else do people continue to speed? Why does the US have a higher murder rate in the states with capital punishment than without?
The fact is that immigration is what keeps the country's average age down - Japan is having much the same problem as soon its going to have more pensioners than people working. What we need to do is control illegal migration.
And the Human Rights act is less about setting the guilty free but making sure that the Birmingham Police didn't do the guy over to get a confession out of him.
I'm sorry, but if you really think all this, perhaps you'd be emigrate? I think Iran is the place you're thinking of.
2006-08-03 05:46:51 · answer #2 · answered by MontyBob 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Getting all businesses in line with European guidelines is crippling our manufacturing market, especially the big companies.
Purchase tax is in, principal, a good idea, but it may give politicians a license to mark things up as they wish like petrol for example.
Matron is now Sister, carers and medical staff should not have to deal with financial things as this is a different talent and should be left with accountants.
Immigration should be toughened ( immigration not asylum ) news of extra housing needed when fuels are in short supply are worrying.
Teaching is hard enough without putting more responsibility on it.
England is depicted as the British Bull dog, I see it as Britain with a bulldog on a lead. If Blair wasn't holding the lead we would all be in a much sorrier place, Blair has been the voice of reason in meetings with Bush.
I don't know what the real reason is, is it religious, fuel oriented or are we really striving for a democratic cruelty free world. I haven't got a clue, and I have a feeling I don't want to know.
2006-08-02 18:15:34 · answer #3 · answered by jimbo_thedude 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Apart from the fact that Charles Dickens is dead.... some of your ideas are excellent but some...... human rights laws? Matrons are not ward 'Sisters' as someone else stated, they are known as number 7's and they don't have a ward...bring back Matron. Bring back punishment and deterrents, start with unruly children because they will sure as hell be horrible adults. Immigration spot on. Unmarried mothers... stop free council houses and benefits for unlimited number of children, fathers should be named. The girls have never worked and never will so their benefits should be docked from their parents pensions...anyone can make one mistake ie one baby. Look after our people... the British...the pensioners...the families...the athletes...the nurses...the farmers...the soldiers...the ordinary people. Forget crusades to the middle east....charity begins at home. I'm not BNP because they are too racist.
2006-08-03 04:50:40 · answer #4 · answered by reggie 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Only one problem I can see, every body would like it but it wouldn't get off the ground 'cos it wouldn't be worth it to the establishment, so they would find some poxy law to make the party illegal ('cos they ain't making owt out of it).
2006-08-03 04:43:45 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yeah let's turn the clock back 100 years!!
2006-08-02 17:51:54 · answer #6 · answered by Jude 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
u have some very good points there. if u want to see this country really improve, then vote for the BNP.
i dont know why people are condemming u for this question, they obviously dont see the bigger picture and wot is really happening!
2006-08-02 20:42:50 · answer #7 · answered by crophilia 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Feadly, seems to me you don't need to set up a new party - just join the UKIP.
2006-08-02 17:53:18 · answer #8 · answered by cognito44 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Lets just Sieg Heil while at it, shall we?
Thank god Britain isnt populated by your kind...
2006-08-02 17:53:49 · answer #9 · answered by thomas p 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
so basically your party is somwhere between the Tories and stalinist russia?
Count me out
2006-08-02 17:54:50 · answer #10 · answered by enigma_variation 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋