When Bush attacks Iraq on a preemptive strike and murders innocent people that's called warfare.
When Hezbollah attacks Israel or terrorists attack the U.S. that's called terrorism.
Why is OK for the one to attack another country and it's people without any direct prior attacks from that country and not OK for the other. It's not OK for anyone to attack a sovereign country without provocation but it's even worse when the media tries to play mind games exclaiming the righteousness of the U.S.
It's just a choice of words applied by the media, and have you asked yourself who owns the US media?
2006-08-02 10:28:08
·
answer #1
·
answered by Isa 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
Nature of human beings when some 1 establish enough in the celebration that person start laughing, dance and other activities and the govt- are also made up by human beings, their establishments are accordingly army resources, military and weapons, so why they attack on Hezbollah, because they have nothing to do to show their power to world finally they attack on Hezbollah, some how Hezbollah past was also not to fair, but killing of innocent people is really bad, that will cost them , ALLAH revenge is always with silence.
2006-08-02 17:17:35
·
answer #2
·
answered by RAMBO 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Any organization that uses family members and civilians as shields is a terrorist organization. Especially when they claim that it's Israel that's killing their kids. If I was firing rockets across the border I would expect retaliation and therefore would not endanger anyone else's life by firing from their apartment building. Hezbollah does this KNOWING that civilians will die. They then try to use this to sway the minds of simpletons, like yourself, to sympathize for them. Please educate yourself before you side with the bad guys.
2006-08-02 17:35:46
·
answer #3
·
answered by freeriderss 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
they use terror tactics to try to submit their enemies. like, in southern Lebanon, when the two Israeli soldiers were abducted. sneaking in and kidnapping two soldiers is a way of sowing terror, and also hostage taking is technically terrorism. Hezbollah, is only a threat to Israel since they haven't attacked or threatened the U.S. The schools they hve, they teach how to kill civilians. they try to pretend they are a big happy israeli hating family. they are using that as propganda to bring people to their cause. they are terrorists beacause they fight like cowards. where were they to defend the lebanese population? they get the support of the people and then say they fight for them. but to them, the people are just more canon fodder and recruits. they fight in the name of God, yet, God wants us to love our neighbors, and not kill. they use God as an excuse to attack someone they can't coexist peacefully with. The Israelis don't launch holy wars against the Islamic countries. the attack because they have had enough of abiding by international laws and letting themselves be attacked by fanatics. everyone protects poor hezbollah, but blames israel.
2006-08-02 17:14:26
·
answer #4
·
answered by Diego A 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
They offer all of these things so they have a good base of people who THINK they are good. They administer unprovoked attacks simply because an entity is not of their religious beliefs.
Yes. They are purely terrorist. The worst kind. Way worse than Al Quida. They have conned the general (poor) public into believing they are the saviors.
Their flag has A RIFLE ON IT.
2006-08-02 17:11:31
·
answer #5
·
answered by NONAME 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Charles de Gaulle was a terrorist then; Nelson Mandela was considered a terrorist leader too.
2006-08-02 17:13:09
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Their sole reason for existing is to destroy Israel-that makes them terrorist. They are a terrorist organization, founded by terrorist for the sole purpose to terrorize. What would you call them-peace keepers?
2006-08-02 17:13:13
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
What would you be if you launched multiple rocket attacks on civilian targets? Or blew up an embassy? Maybe you should strap on a bomb vest and go to Wal-Mart. Then you could fit right in with them.
2006-08-02 17:13:15
·
answer #8
·
answered by mrkymrk64 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
G W Bush disagrees with them hence they are defined as terrorists.
2006-08-02 17:11:43
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
One man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter.
2006-08-02 17:10:27
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋