English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

25 answers

First off, ignore those with the smart aleck answers. Other dimensions are not just the stuff of science fiction stories, they are a very real possibility.

According to the Inflationary Universe Theory, other dimensions - countless others - are not only possible, they are necessary for our own universe to exist!

Quantum Theory also accepts the possibility of other dimensions, and the possibility that there is interaction between our dimension and an unknown number of other dimensions at the subatomic level.

So do I believe in these other universes? Let's just say that there are some pretty strange things out there. We don't even fully understand our own universe, let alone the nature of reality itself.

So get out your "moron" stamp and apply it to the foreheads of those who dissed your initial question. They need to read more and speak a lot less.

For more on Inflationary universe theory, check this link:

http://csep10.phys.utk.edu/astr162/lect/cosmology/inflation.html

2006-08-02 12:19:23 · answer #1 · answered by cailano 6 · 0 0

The mathematics of relativity theory, quantum theory, and superstring theory do not rule out the possibility of other dimensions or parallel universes. That does not mean that scientists "believe in" them. It just means those theories haven't been disproved (and may never be disproved). Unlike "faith" where you "believe in" something without any proof, or "blind faith", where you believe in something despite proof to the contrary. I therefore do not "believe in" multiverses or higher dimensions, but it is still fun to speculate "what if?" Scientists and mathematicians go one step further, they try to test their theories. We're a long way from being able to test for "strings" -- to say nothing of other dimensions outside or within spacetime. The parallel universe theories are awkward though -- every time something happens, like a photon bounces off a dust particle in intergalactic space, another universe is supposedly created. That's a bit too much for me to entertain.

2006-08-02 10:35:35 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I'm glad you used the word "believe"! The musings of some other writers notwithstanding, there is not the flimsiest scrap of evidence to support the idea of "parallel universes."

I think you'll find that the largest element in this talk of "parallel universes" is really the self-centeredness of some. They like to think that the universe revolves around themselves, such that every step they take must be part of some cosmos-altering super-event. How could anyone disprove their notion, especially when they also believe that the universe itself is really just a dream in their minds, to vanish when they wake up! (giggles)

2006-08-02 12:52:50 · answer #3 · answered by Anne Marie 6 · 0 0

i do no longer think of we would ever have the means to circulate to a distinctive universe, different than by using our strategies. I substitute into conscious of parallel universes as differences in dimensions we can't sense, the judgements we make (or the movements we've been destined to make because of fact the massive bang) are the place replace universes are created or variety a minimum of. in one universe gravity would be greater helpful than electromagnetism, or in step with probability finished cereal would contain lots greater sugar. each little thing that would have in all probability happened will in those replace universes and each little thing that, to us, would under no circumstances be possible additionally occurs because of fact that's no longer only stupid issues like loose will yet in addition the regulations that govern our universe will/could be distinctive as nicely.

2016-12-10 20:17:59 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

I totally believe in string theory (m-theory). I really think there are 11 dimensions in total wrapped up within each other and there are branes. Why I believe this theory is because there has to be some reason for all the beautiful math(string theory math) that meshes together so perfectly.

2006-08-02 10:42:21 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

If there are infinite "parallel dimensions" are the laws of physics always the same?
What I'm getting at is WHY are the laws of physics the way they are?
Can they be altered?

2006-08-03 06:08:23 · answer #6 · answered by me 1 · 0 0

i do believe that if the universe is truely infinite, then it is a logical certainty that every possible solution is out there. if you roll a dice with 1,000 numbers on it an infinite amount of times, you will eventually get every number. so if the universe goes on forever then it is certain that every possible solution is out there, even a universe the exect same as ours. even a universe like ours but where earth is one square inch smaller. or a universe like ours but earth is one square inch smaller and you have red hair. even one that is exactly the same, except you are playing hockey right now. and one that is the same but you are playing hockey while speaking french. do you understand where im going with this? infinite means all possibilities must be covered. not only in existence, but in an incalculable amount. if the universe is infinite. then every possible solution must show up an infinite amount of times.

2006-08-02 15:34:56 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

other dimensions do exist. we see in 2d + 1 we know what 3d is and we know that 4D is used to express space/time. and as far a parallel universes. you would have to first give me a full explenation of what you would concider a universe. there are multiple explenations.

2006-08-02 10:14:50 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Yeah, I like the "String theory". Try reading timeline by Michael Crichton. It is based upon this, and is a good read.
I think that psychics may just be people who can think cross-dimensionally.
I haven't heard of membrane theory George. I will have to check it out.

2006-08-02 10:07:06 · answer #9 · answered by spiegy2000 6 · 0 0

I do. Our universe is made up of possibilities by it's very nature. It seems built upon combinations. Wonder what the very first combinations were made out of? Existance and non existance? Has there ever been any real scientific evidence about the existance of non existance? mmmm......think I'll have to ask that one.

2006-08-03 03:50:12 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers