I have Matt but i think i can get eli for him straight up...should i do it??
2006-08-02 09:54:04 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports ➔ Fantasy Sports
Both are relatively equal in my book but I would keep Hass over Eli Manning. Plaxico Burress faded out in the second-half and overachieved last season, with only Jeremy Shockey as a great target, his INTs will go down but his TDs may go down as well.
The signing of Burleson will work wonders in Seattle. Next to Moss, Burleson was on the verge of stardom before being forced into the #1 role. He's not a #1 and as a #2 with DJax and Shaun Alexander in town, he should do great this year.
2006-08-02 10:02:58 · answer #1 · answered by philliez01 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, no, and once more.. NO... Eli is still maturing, and the Giant Offense is fairly questionable at best.
Matt H. Has much more reliable weapons at his disposal, and depth at receiver. Plus in Seattles West Coast offense, he will be passing plenty. Eli will not be better than Matt this year, if ever.
2006-08-02 14:50:29 · answer #2 · answered by rychendroll 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
DEFINITELY ELI! Hasselback has no options in seattle except burleson......plus Eli and Plaxico will soon become the next Peyton and Harrison duo. With the great year Eli had last year with it only being his 2nd.....dude it only gets better!!!!
2006-08-02 15:56:41 · answer #3 · answered by The Air Shake 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
keep hasselbeck. Defense is a weakness in the divison hasselbeck is in.
2006-08-02 10:25:51 · answer #4 · answered by MikeAwesome 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
keep hasslebeck. proven guy
2006-08-02 10:04:32 · answer #5 · answered by Jeff M 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
NO!!!!!! Hasselbeck will be better for u
2006-08-02 09:58:45 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋