This question will already be answered with YES! when you pose ME a question. But I will award the 10 points Yahoo has entrusted to my care ONLY to the first question that >> I << can't answer!
Did that make your brain whirl around a few times in your skull like a stray sock in a clothes drier on steroids? --WOW!! I bet it did.
Here's the catch. You must not ask a question that pertains to your personal life or the life of any person of your kinship or personal association. Stuff like that, you know? And ALL YAHOO RULES apply--needless to say.
Ask away, Dudes and Dudettes, as the case may be!!!
2006-08-02
09:17:51
·
35 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Entertainment & Music
➔ Other - Entertainment
How I will handle my answers is to post each one here like this !! See???
ANSWER TO XXXX IS: XYZ!!!
2006-08-02
09:20:28 ·
update #1
I haven't even read into the responses yet and I have received 30 in the first 7 minutes!! That has to be a record of some sort. (Watch me get shot down with the first one--MATH, I bet!!)
2006-08-02
09:44:32 ·
update #2
JOKERKID--ANS: Food!
2006-08-02
09:45:35 ·
update #3
DUH! ANS--Insufficient data. You do not mention which limb or under what set of judging rules. See the diversity in these websites--
http://www.drillsandskills.com/article/10
http://www2.terc.edu/handsonIssues/f94/cartcam.html
http://www.mspineapple.com/t38.html
http://www.usa-gymnastics.org/publications/technique/1999/4/wtc-mar5.html
2006-08-02
09:56:00 ·
update #4
DAVE'S--ANS: The Romans usually wore sandles of various types or a type of chukka boot as we would call them and each was custom-fitted to each individual and even interchangable among individuals because of the easy adjustments that could be made.
So, because of these factors, the Romans did not think in terms of "sizes" as we do. They literally had two basic types of footwear that "one size fit all".
http://www.unc.edu/courses/rometech/public/content/arts_and_crafts/April_Anderson/shoes.html
Thus, we do not know what size "shoe" Julius wore.
(I would hazard a guess that we would consider it equvalent to today's "small" or medium small--modern sizes of 7 1/2 to 9 for men.)
Best answer possible under the conditions you posed and terms you used, I believe.
2006-08-02
10:04:41 ·
update #5
Jaz-ANS: Other than apparently relating to the Arbitrary Trajectory Quantization Method, I can't crack this question with even an approximation since further discussions of qct-n or just qct alone are in science journals which required subscriptions to obtain.
Thus--Math (again!!) has been my undoing. And thanks for the 35 responses I obtained.
WOW!!!! I will have a lot of fun twisting some of those around and asking them again to the world--and THAT was MY objective in all this. To get a bunch of questions suggested.
Thanks to all...
2006-08-02
10:19:17 ·
update #6