was his acting in pirates of the caribbean naff or what..
2006-08-02 08:59:42 · 37 answers · asked by Anonymous in Entertainment & Music ➔ Celebrities
Haven't seen the new one. I thought it was cheerfully camp, in the first one.
2006-08-02 09:03:20 · answer #1 · answered by Neil - the hypocrite 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no way!
He brought an irreverence to what could have been a very dull film (orlando bloom doing his best errol flynn film impression was embarrasing to say the least.) Depp gave Jack life and always left the viewer wanting to know that little bit more about him, keeping a mystery and mystique intact at all times.
Whilst it is not Depps greatest performance by any means, calling it naff is very out of order
2006-08-02 09:08:34 · answer #2 · answered by enigma_variation 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think they all (not just Depp) fancied themselves a bit too much and it shows. It detracts from their efforts to act in character because all the time they and everyone around them is thinking how cool and sexy they are. So, my answer is that I wasn't aware of an awful lot of acting going on- just some very glossy directing and production. I've seen more acting in an episode of Star Trek - and at least that didn't take up so much time, money and needless hype.
2006-08-02 09:15:16 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I liked his acting in pirates of the Caribbean and I think he is hot. Plus he made big money off the movie.
2006-08-02 09:23:45 · answer #4 · answered by Redbuddafly 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No he was the only decent thing about the entire movie. If you want to talk about naff acting lets chat about Orlando Bloom and Keira Knightley- diabolical!
2006-08-05 01:01:48 · answer #5 · answered by little pink dynamite 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If you didn't like Depp's acting then you don't really get the character he has developed. Depp is amazing. The movie was not as well written as the first. Perhaps that's the problem.
2006-08-02 09:10:24 · answer #6 · answered by purplefish001 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Dont Diss the Depp
2006-08-02 09:08:04 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No its was absolutl\y brill iant JOHNNY DEPP is the greatest in the world of course lol ( im his no.1 fan if ya hadnt of alredy gessed )
2006-08-02 21:53:07 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Thought the first was better...but I'm a great fan of Depp - no matter what.
2006-08-02 09:18:02 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
He based the character on keith richards from the rolling stones, which, if you think about it, is just short of a stroke of genius. the audience the film is aimed at, children, wont know keith richards from wendy richards so they will think he is very original and amusing where as us adults can laugh at how accurate he is at playing keith.
2006-08-02 09:22:52 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
He was great in part one...they turned him into a cowardly jerk in part two and the only funny lines were throw backs from the first movie.
2006-08-02 09:05:11 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋