I already live in Idaho; how much more anarchy can a person take?!
2006-08-02 07:56:45
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
no i would not , there are to many idiots out there . the simple fact that they had to make a law to where it is illegal to have sex with a dead animal tells me i do not want to see anarchy , i am very happy laws and rules are in place
2006-08-02 14:55:52
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Woooo ANARCHY!!! Let's take the White House by storm first. Then tear down the Yahoo servers so no one can ask retarded questions anymore like "am i hot?". Burn it all down. Do what we want when we want... as long as it all ends in time for football season!
2006-08-02 16:52:31
·
answer #3
·
answered by jdscorrupted 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
No. I'd be easy prey. Near anarchy, with rules only to protect me from attack or theft, would be great.
2006-08-02 14:53:16
·
answer #4
·
answered by timm1776 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Not complete Anarchy.........I am a Repubitarian....not a complete Libertarian
2006-08-02 14:53:47
·
answer #5
·
answered by J 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
The crazy chaotic side of me craves to say yes. But it would be dangerous, like in the middle ages. Laws really weren't enfourced unless you were high up enough. there would be murder and plunder and al sorts of hectic messes.
2006-08-02 14:53:55
·
answer #6
·
answered by Phsyco Santa 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Nope.
For one thing, I would miss the Internet & forums like this one to chat about how terrible the government is. ;)
2006-08-02 14:54:54
·
answer #7
·
answered by Dave of the Hill People 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I have always felt I would do very well for myself in a post apocalyptic wasteland.
2006-08-02 14:52:54
·
answer #8
·
answered by Darian D 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
only for one or two days. it wouldn't be fun to run out of food because everyone stole it
2006-08-02 14:53:09
·
answer #9
·
answered by Running Riot! 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
no that would suck. i don't want to die. :) interesting question tho.
2006-08-02 14:52:19
·
answer #10
·
answered by hmbn 4
·
0⤊
0⤋