please answer this question: Would they be more likely to interview an aurthor of a new book about "a woman's right to chose," or the author of a book "defending the right to life?"
2006-08-02 05:57:10 · 5 answers · asked by Bluebeard 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
This is a funny question. PBS and NPR are only slanted toward the way in which the supporters allow it to slant. They are both solely dependent on viewer/listener contributions. So, if a left majority donate money, then the programs are going to have a majority of biased opinions that way. Stop complaining and just go watch Fox News or listen to Fox news on the radio.
2006-08-02 06:03:19 · answer #1 · answered by johngrobmyer 5 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Well,they would most likely interview an "aurthor" over a woman's right to choose.This is a good choice.Most likely,the pro-life book was written by or appluaded by serious right-wing anti-abortion screwballs.So yes,the left slant is appropriate there.
2006-08-02 13:12:08 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Do you actually ever watch PBS or listen to NPR? I do both.
Despite what people like Rush claim both NPR and PBS try to always be as impartial as possible and show all sides of a story.
Something to think about.: Laura Bush has claimed that she loves NPR, listens to it regularly. Do you really think the president's wife would be doing so if it were leftist?
2006-08-02 13:17:44 · answer #3 · answered by Doc Watson 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
So what if it's slanted towards the left. Should I be mad because Fox is slanted towards the right? Who cares. Go outside and enjoy life.
2006-08-02 13:03:30 · answer #4 · answered by Lotus Phoenix 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
What makes you think they would'nt have both?
2006-08-02 13:01:38 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋