ONLY AMERICANS PLS: Do you think it was right to attack the Iraq?

Question

I read some interesting statements on this topic in Yahoo Answers. However, I'm a Europeen so I don't know if these are the common opinions...

Answer 1

ABSOLUTELY

Answer 2

Iraq NEVER attacked us; Iraq had NOTHING to do with 911; and they NEVER had weapons of mass destruction. You tell me if it was right to attack them.

Iraq had NOTHING to do with 911; Osama Bin Laden did.

We attacked Iraq because the oil companies want to control the oil fields. Wait for the next 2-3 years when we completely control Iraq's oil. The oil execs will have the oil prices so high we'll be paying $4-5/gallon. They've made BILLIONS off of this "war".

We backed Iraq in the 80's and supplied them with weapons during their war with Iran. 95% of the terrorists are backed by Saudi Arabian money, but because of their financial relationships with many American Political people, and big corporations, we turn our heads.

Bush says to support our troops but he backed the Republican bill earlier this year that decreased the benefits to many American veterans. I know because I own a medical corporation and our company gives free equipment and services because of the decrease in services. I support the troops with my money and time; does he?

This war is about money. Greed has overtaken our world. Corruption is at an all time high, and the Iraq war tops the list.

Weapons of Mass Destruction? In 2000 Condy Rice said that there were NO weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, and so did Colin Powell. After Bush said there was, they changed their minds. Powell said in front of the UN they had absolute proof. They did this so he could be the scape goat when they were proven wrong.

People need to start telling it like it is instead of telling it like it might be. Al Qaeda is backed mostly by Saudi Arabian and Pakistani money. During the Soviet Union attacks in Afghanistan, we actually indirectly backed the Al Queda through our money given to Pakistan. People need to get their facts straight instead of just throwing stuff out there.

Answer 3

Yes - otherwise Sadaam would still be providing and funding the Al Queda terrorists.

Since you are in Europe, you better get a common opinion quick because the Muslems will take over Europe soon if they are not stopped!

Answer 4

Attacking a Country is not the right thing to do. Its the people in politics that decide to go to war but unfortunately they're not the ones to die.

Answer 5

I really dont know. I think history will provide the answer. So many different factions there...so willing to fight each other. Its quite different from western civilization. Perhaps they needed a bully like Hussein to keep the peace. Is peace possible now? I dont know?

Answer 6

Was it right 4 iraq to attack us?

Answer 7

Hello,

Offcourse it wasn't. there original reason was for secret weapons..then no weapon was found now they decided to overthrow saddam hussain ..okay ....whatever..the war ..come on now..america is more well equipped than iraq...

it isn't fair.....

Answer 8

For goodness sake of course.

Answer 9

i don't care if i'm not an american...'cause i still want to answer this...NO!! NOPE!!! DEFINITELY NOT!!..it's like the stupidest thing to do...they say they are doing it for the sake of world peace...but they are makin' it worst

Answer 10

absolutely not we can't even take care of our own problems let alone other countries

Answer 11

WHY ONLY FOR AMERICANS ? I'M AN INDIAN BUT I THINK SO IT WAS RIGHT