2006-08-02 04:59:59 · 12 answers · asked by MERVIN D 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
get in where and fight? the US will not send troops into Lebanon if that is what you are thinking.
2006-08-02 05:02:38 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
If the US Management would go! then the US people wouldnt be glad anyway.... but in all cases, I dont think the US would dare to do such movement after Iraqi war .... they destroyed teh country and reached nothing, the democrecy at least would give others the right to live... for sorrow, no one is given this right in Iraq niether any place the US troops went to. We must think about the human future more than Money , oil and private deals and Comm.
Wish we can go 1000 years behind where no technology, no oil and no one would kill from that far
2006-08-02 12:07:30 · answer #2 · answered by rayess00 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hi! The next time the USA takes on anyone it should ask Britain first... America is all Brawn & no brain. The SAS always have to save the Amercan troops & the missing in action CIA. Just push the putton on the Middle East - it will save a lot of US & UK troops.
2006-08-02 12:09:11 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
My friend,
USA is not glad,
has no chance anywhere whatsoever,
and will not fight any other nation again.
2006-08-02 12:07:53 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The US is combat weary. Our fighting force has been busy in Afghanistan and Irag for almost five years now. Constant battling, injury and death has really taken its toll. We don't want to take on anyone else right now. However, we will if we truly have to.
2006-08-02 12:04:20 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Unfortunately in a capitalist society there's money to be made by going to war so my answer is a tentative yes. Equally unfortunate is the flawed US foreign policy that consistently says we have to force our form of government on others that may/might not want to govern themselves the way we do. PEACE!
2006-08-02 12:04:09 · answer #6 · answered by thebigm57 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
We aren't in this war yet. It's possible that if Isreal needs us we'll go in but so far very few troops are being sent there. I know my uncle was sent there for a month to help train Russian mp's but very few troops are actually there.
2006-08-02 12:07:30 · answer #7 · answered by FaNtaBuLouS 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If you take a good look at history, the U.S. can't go too long without getting involved in some police action, or war somewhere in the world.
2006-08-02 12:05:04 · answer #8 · answered by WC 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Contrary to popular opinion, the US only fights when it absolutely feels it is necessary. We never start fights, but we sure get drug into a lot of them.
2006-08-02 12:06:28 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
if you mean the middle east, i think the us (and tony blair) are waiting for iran to come to lebanon's aid, thus giving bush and blair a reason to attack iran. which may explain why they're sitting back and not doing much.
2006-08-02 12:04:40 · answer #10 · answered by Natalie R 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋