English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

17 answers

Of course. He had everything to do with it, and if you do a little research, you will be able to find the truth. However, you will not find the truth on FOX news. There are plenty of videos on the internet which show how the WTC was brought down. (Not by the "terrorists planes" as our government would have us think.) Do you know who William Rodriguez is? Google his name and find out. He is an eye witness to 9/11 and a REAL HERO. Find out all the info on him and watch the videos. Every other country in the world has seen these videos except the United States. Hmmmm, wonder why?

2006-08-02 04:56:09 · answer #1 · answered by FreeThinker 2 · 0 2

I think Bush's nonchalant attitude about terrorism leading up to 9-11 certainly didn't help. Clinton also didn't take terrorism seriously until the bombing of the Cole, and by then it was almost too late (he was on his way out of office). But if you're asking if Bush was in some way BEHIND 9-11 -- that he somehow planned the attacks -- then no, I think do not believe he had anything to do with it. But our government has certainly done horrible things in the past, so there's nothing wrong with asking the question.

2006-08-02 12:01:40 · answer #2 · answered by Dave C 2 · 0 0

Bush had been president for 9 months when 9/11 happened. Clinton informed him on leaving office that Al Queda was number one threat to the US. Richard Clarke head of antiterroism tryed to get meetings with Bush and Cheney for months prior to 9/11, they never met with him. Cheney was head of White House Antiterrorism task force -- and did not have one meeting before 9/11. Bush got Daily Briefing in Early August, 2001, "Al Queda Determined to Strike in US. The evidence clearly shows Bush adminstration didn't have terrorism anywhere near the top of their priority list. Blaming Clinton is an incredibly lame excuse that is fit for a ten year old, not for the President of the United States who has been in office for 9 months. The Bush administration was AT BEST negligent. At worst -- well why was NORAD not promptly informed and then misinformed? How did jets indentified as hijacked remain unintercepted for 45 minutes afterwards? CHENEY was in charge of a "war games" taking place that day. Why were the FAA tapes of the air traffic controllers destroyed for the time period that the attacks were taking place. Why did Bush and Cheney refuse to testify under oath to the 9/11 commission?

Bush was in charge, had been president for 9 months. 9/11 happened on his watch. The buck stops there. It was not "Billys Fault".

2006-08-02 12:00:17 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

what is funny is that most people who say yes or no don't look into it either way. if it was something to scoff and turn away from, why do o'reilly and hannity have people with these views on their shows? to yell, make fun and attempt at discrediting them.

C-SPAN recently ran a 9/11 symposium AND roundtable. So the theories actually are credible. It took five years to notice though.

Oh, and Alex Jones has been following government sponsored terrorism for close to 15 years I believe and covered the Waco scandal and everything Clinton did too. So you can't plaster the liberal tag to him.

Only the crazy tag, because that is all you sad people have when you can't argue due to your refusal to research.

2006-08-02 12:03:10 · answer #4 · answered by DEP 3 · 0 0

Yes I do.. By the way.. Clinton, was looking in to that, When Republicans, started putting their nose. where it didn't belong. Bill's Private life is none of our business. I think Bush had a lot to do with it. He cheats, conniving, And, He dose not care about our Country.. I don't know how anyone can say it's Bill fought .I had more money in the bank when Bill was in office. And, People had jobs.

2006-08-02 12:16:42 · answer #5 · answered by Daris G 3 · 0 0

that's total bs! Bush is NOT an immoral man..his presidency was the victim of 9/11...he was just the president at the worst time in American history!!!

2006-08-02 11:58:56 · answer #6 · answered by lonesomelover 1 · 0 0

Not anything..Everything.The transcript the feds released this week of the final minutes of Flight 93 proves that President Bush brazenly and consistently lied to the American people about how that flight ended. The transcript shows that the Arab hijackers chose to crash the plane into the ground after the American passengers stormed the cockpit. There is no guarantee that the transcript is accurate, and the government has already been caught fabricating evidence at terrorist trials in the post 9/11 era. But the government’s own version of events damns Bush. The transcript was available in early 2002, if not earlier, and was shown at that time by federal officials to some of the survivors of the people killed when Flight 93 went down.

Bush turned the 9/11 attacks into a moral allegory. He continually invoked the story of Flight 93 to persuade Americans of the need to reform their lives. In a speech at a Lacrosse, Wisconsin high school on May 8, 2002, Bush announced:

"I think the most telling event on September 11th, and one that I hope a lot of people remember, is what happened on Flight 93. Basically, what I’m saying is, it’s important to serve something greater than yourself in life. It’s important to serve a call greater than yourself and a cause greater than yourself. Flight 93, we had average citizens flying across the country, and they realized their plane was fixing to be used as a weapon on the Nation’s Capital. They called their loved ones on the phone. They said a prayer and told them they loved them, said a prayer, and they drove the plane in the ground to serve something greater than themselves. That’s the American spirit I know. That’s that sense of sacrifice that makes this country so strong."

Everyone not comatose during all of 2002 likely heard Bush’s Flight 93 spiel:

On March 18, 2002, Bush, speaking to factory workers in O’Fallon, Missouri, declared that Flight 93 would help launch a new "period of personal responsibility."

In Knoxville on April 8, 2002, Bush declared, "Flight 93 told me a lot about America. . . . It is that spirit that is alive and well in America, and it’s that spirit that makes me so optimistic about the future of this great country."

At an April 29, 2002, California political fundraiser, Bush invoked Flight 93 as proof of the "new culture" of "serving something greater than yourself in life" and claimed that "Out of the evil done to America is going to come incredible good" because "we are such a good nation."

The next day at another fundraiser, Bush declared that "Flight 93 really, in many ways, epitomized the best of America."

At yet another Republican fundraiser, this one in Florida on June 21, 2002, Bush declared that Flight 93 was "the most compelling story, of course, in my judgment, after 9/11 or during 9/11."

And on September 17, 2002, at a school in Nashville, Bush expanded his parable to include the love of freedom: "It’s a lesson of people loving freedom so much and loving their country so much, that they’re willing to drive a plane into the ground to save other people’s lives."

Yet, at the least, there was never any evidence that Flight 93 passengers chose to commit suicide (as opposed to fighting to capture control of the plane from the hijackers).

Bush’s obsessive focus on Flight 93 shifted public attention to heroic citizens and away from incompetent bureaucrats. But Bush had no excuse not to know that his Flight 93 allegory was a sham. FBI director Robert Mueller told a closed congressional hearing in 2002 that Flight 93 crashed a few minutes after one of the hijackers "advised [Ziad] Jarrah [the hijacker piloting the plane] to crash the plane and end the passengers’ attempt to retake the airplane." An August 2003 Associated Press report noted that the FBI’s interpretation, "based on the government’s analysis of cockpit recordings, discounts the popular perception of passengers grappling with terrorists to seize the plane’s controls." No one did more to popularize the bogus version of events than Bush.

The FBI director’s conclusion was not made public until the report of the joint congressional intelligence committees was released in late July 2003.

How many Americans, hornswoggled by Bush’s lies about Flight 93, volunteered to join the military and ended up dying for Bush’s lies on Iraq?

Post 9/11 America shows what happens when a nation worships its leader and permits him to tell one lie after another, distorting facts and manipulating the public’s emotions. If Bush had not been treated so respectfully after 9/11, he could not have easily lead the nation to war against Iraq. If Bush had not been permitted to exploit government failure, the government would not have become much more powerful.

2006-08-02 11:58:43 · answer #7 · answered by tough as hell 3 · 0 0

That is ridiculous. The democratic party left-wingers (AKA Communists) have been trying to pin that on him for years. They would never have even thought that if Cliunton was still in office!

2006-08-02 11:48:13 · answer #8 · answered by No Liberals 2 · 0 0

You should see for yourself. There is a great documentary called Loose Change. Here is the website to watch it...
www.loosechange911.com/

2006-08-02 12:41:45 · answer #9 · answered by K-Lynn 2 · 0 0

I would hate to think that any American president would pull a "Reichstag Fire" scenario in order to put forth an agenda that was decidedly fascist.

2006-08-02 12:00:38 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers