2006-08-01 17:22:35 · 13 answers · asked by espresso 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Bush has between the wars in two Countries. The Afghans are uprising over Bush policies right now since the Government has a 65% unemployment rate to live with. The news reported tonight the Bush Administration is calling for ten more years of military coverage in the Middle East...Wouldn't that just be for Israel?
2006-08-01 18:19:51 · answer #1 · answered by Jenny_is_Hot 6 · 13⤊ 0⤋
You people are starting to scare me with these kinds of questions. So if I understand the answers here most of you think Bush is a bigger terrorist a worse person then Hussein? Wow what is this world coming to. You are so far out of the realm of reality I'm not going to waste my time and give you the history of Saddam Hussein. I just hope and pray that none of you ever go into government.
2006-08-01 17:44:31 · answer #2 · answered by crusinthru 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
it depends on how you look at it. Saddam killed both inside Iraq and outside, and when you count the Iran Iraq war, in which millions of people died on both sides, and the chemical weapons used on the Kurds and other minorities in Iraq, saddams got a good number of deaths on his account. but as bush is just getting warmed up and still has a little over two years to go, he might have a million in by the end of his term. if you don't count the Iran-Iraq war though, by 2008 bush'll definitely be in the lead.
2006-08-01 17:42:29 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Are you serious? Which people is Bush supposedly having killed, our own, the Iraqis, Al Qaeda? How is it that one can compare what Bush is doing with what Sadamn did. You have the freedom to say anything you want about Bush and he cannot do anything about it. Do you know why Because you have Freedom of Speech among other things. On the other hand if you lived in Iraq when sadamn was in power and you asked him this question, where do you think you'd be right now. (six foot under).
2006-08-01 17:39:33 · answer #4 · answered by Karen N 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think Saddam is still ahead, but he's been on the bench lately (i'm guessing 100,000 for Saddam at most). But with causing the instability in Iraq, I'd say Bush is at 50,000. there might have been a more intelligent way, than to take Cheny's word for it.
2006-08-01 17:34:17 · answer #5 · answered by kentonmankle 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Certainly it is Bush,who threw his owen people for killing just for his individual satisfaction while Saddam did it all under sheer compulsion and also in furtherance to the national interests.
2006-08-01 17:39:13 · answer #6 · answered by watan yash 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
President Bush hasn't killed anyone. Cheney shot a guy once but he lived. ted kennedy has actually killed a person. Why not investigate that. Maybe you are a damnocrat and you can't handle the truth?
2006-08-02 03:49:27 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Saddam,
He killed between 500,000 and 1,000,000 of his own people. Many of them were Kurds who he was threatened by. Another question is: how many more would he have killed if the US had not stopped him?
2006-08-01 17:47:12 · answer #8 · answered by b833 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
saddam easily anybody that says bush doesn't know what the hell they are talking about
2006-08-01 18:59:04 · answer #9 · answered by MIKE B 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
bush... 10,000 in Afghanistan and 100,000 in Iraq
Saddam= 800 in Iraq (killed those people who commited crimes)
2006-08-01 17:31:18 · answer #10 · answered by Abdul S 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋