i think there's a invasion plan for that piece of world that began with Iraq, most likely they will invade Iran in a couple of years or so...
2006-08-01 16:53:59
·
answer #1
·
answered by ? 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
Simply: not soon.
Not so simply: There is a reason that the US is avoiding the Israeli, Hizbullah conflict too. Money.
While securing oil and other resources have long been criticized as a priority for the West and the Us in particular, very rarely do people consider the amount of natural resources expended to continue a war in the first place. Our rising gas prices are an indication of the effects of war, it simply does not make sense to attack a target for their oil when you will have to expend so much oil in order to do it.
In the case of the Israeli/Hizbullah conflict, non-involvement makes much more sense.
The US have long been supporters of the Israeli government in their effort to promote democracy in the region. As the Muslim nations have become the new "communists" or rather, the largest ideological challengers to the capitalist West, supporting Israel is not only efficient in promoting US hegemony, but also secures them as a partner when they take over the oil that the US requires to annex other oil producing countries in the future.
Iran poses a threat, but they are no more threatening now than they will be in a few years. There is a reason why the US government is quick to name communist and muslim political leaders as terrorists. Look at it as economic earmarking. When the money flows back, and their resources are plentiful, or they can dupe someone else into fighting the war for them, they will choose another target. Think of Canada, the Northern Alliance and others who now fight the US war on terrorism in Afghanistan.
The question isn't so much, whether they will go into Iran or not, but when Iran will hit the top of the list of all of the many countries they have earmarked in the last few years.
2006-08-02 00:59:02
·
answer #2
·
answered by reignofstonetears 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
In the year 1997,on ABC news, they reported that there was a list of 5 countries that we were going to attack. I think it had something to do with securing the oil fields. These countries listed were;
Iraq
Iran
Syria
Yemen
Saudi Arabia
Yes, I think we are. About the manpower that would be needed for all of this, I've heard that one of the reasons for the push to allow the illegal aliens to get drivers licenses is to be able to draft them into the military. Plenty of manpower there. They really would be doing the jobs Americans wouldn't want then.
2006-08-02 00:16:56
·
answer #3
·
answered by doggybag300 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Maybe, but I don't think its chance that we stand between Iran and Isreal (forces in Iraq).
We are already fighting Iranians in Iraq, and its going to get worse.
(iran is geographically surrounded by american forces, itc?)
2006-08-01 23:52:48
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
The Americans won`t but Bush might he is the decider not the American people right.
2006-08-01 23:55:24
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
No. I think that I could be possible to establish just missle intercepters in the region. That way everybody's happy and no one gets hurt
2006-08-01 23:55:00
·
answer #6
·
answered by profile image 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
No what we have to do is use fake Iranian missles and bomb Isreal that way we can supply Isreal more free missles to kill the Iranians
2006-08-01 23:55:26
·
answer #7
·
answered by johnman142 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
No, they are spread thin as it is.
2006-08-01 23:51:47
·
answer #8
·
answered by bumpocooper 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
I hope not.
2006-08-01 23:54:30
·
answer #9
·
answered by Aussie Chick 5
·
0⤊
0⤋