We've had 5 years of corruption, debt, failure & war. Under Bill Clinton we had 8 years of peace and prosperity.
2006-08-01 14:42:08 · 26 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
George Bush is just a plain idiot. Incompetent is a very good word for him. He's an embarrasment to the United States.
2006-08-01 14:46:12 · answer #1 · answered by CG234 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Neither.
Peace with Clinton? Tell me, are the troops still in Bosnia or did he bring them home YET? Then there was the thing in Africa that they made the movie "Black Hawk Down" from. He refused to give them what they needed to do the job and forced them to leave men behind. And let's not forget that he was offered bin Laden at least twice and wouldn't take him, but I wouldn't blame 9/11 just on Bill. Prosperity? The economy hasn't been this good since WWII. Clinton's economy was what? Back to the Depression? Corruption? You mean White Water? You mean selling stays in the Lincoln bedroom for campaign contributions? How much was that? five thousand a pop? And then there's the most memorable Clinton corruption, but then "that depends on what your definition of "is" is."
2006-08-01 14:51:34 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I liked President Clinton but while he did not respond to the terrorist acts during his presidency, President Bush did respond. It has thrown us into war and wartime presidents are never popular AT THE TIME but history will show that later on, people can see that they did what they had to do to protect their country. President Bush is neither incompetent nor unlucky. He is a man of principle, with high moral standards and a firm resolve to do what he thinks is right. He did become president at a time when the Democrats had no one to run against him who had the intelligence, strength of character or even a platform built on more than hatred for the Republicans. And with the far left faction feathering the pockets of the media, the American people are only hearing one side of the story. And at the present time the Democrats still haven't found a worthwhile platform for their party nor a person fit to be president. Howard Dean, with all his screaming and ranting is far too angry to have such a sensitive job; Al Gore doesn't have the intelligence of a rat's behind; and then there's John Kerry who votes for it/against it/for it/against it like a leaf whirling through a hurricane.
2006-08-01 14:57:42 · answer #3 · answered by missingora 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Which month of Clinton's 8 years did the peace occur in? Cause the way I remember it we saw more combat operations under Clinton than we have under President Bush. You left out 8 years of corruption on Bill's side. Fair and balanced ya know.
2006-08-01 14:48:07 · answer #4 · answered by johngjordan 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
People think Bush started the war and brought problems. If you do some research you will realize that this was happening WAY before Bush became President. Did you know Clinton knew about it? He just put it off so he could try to be popular; besides he was too busy with sex scandels. Bush couldnt help it September 11 happened while he was in office which pushed us over to invasion. This was long in coming and would have happened anyway. Im just glad it wasnt put off any longer to become worse.
2006-08-01 14:48:12 · answer #5 · answered by A* 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Incompetent.
2006-08-01 14:46:09 · answer #6 · answered by First Lady 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Are you an idiot or just a dumbass. The peace that pimping bill enjoyed, was because he was too chickensh*t to take a stand. He would rather sit in his chair getting a bj than worry about the US.
2006-08-02 04:03:03 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
This is quite tiring. Bill Clinton is a liberal icon, and that's okay, but please stop lying about his presidency. His legacy will be dna splashed on a blue dress. It may not seem fair, but when his name comes up, what do you think of first? (be honest) . He will forever be linked to Monica and his lack of morals. President Bush is a good president, not perfect, but good, who has been treated quite disrespectfully.
2006-08-01 14:57:48 · answer #8 · answered by rosi l 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Absolutely incompetence. Good luck or bad luck is something you create yourself by your actions. So you could say he is also unlucky, except these two characteristics are not mutually exclusive. That is, one does not foreclose the other.
2006-08-01 14:47:52 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I honestly believe that he wouldn't have made it so far in his career if he was "incompetent". However, I am not saying that he has made the right decisions. I just feel "incompetent" isn't the right word.
2006-08-01 14:48:12 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋