but,killing is a curse on all humanity,so are we all going to hell.israel and lebonon,they both kill women and children,so is it worth the price of our souls .?
2006-08-01 14:39:39 · 26 answers · asked by CIVILIAN 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
As an atheist the second pat of you question is totally irrelevant, as to the first part, yes they are a cancer and should be put down like the mad dogs that they are. Of course the problem is who gets to define who is a terrorist?
2006-08-01 14:50:30 · answer #1 · answered by ♣ My Brainhurts ♣ 5 · 9⤊ 5⤋
For 8 months bombs were dropped by the USA and British Air Forces on Iraq even before the illegal invasion of that country (contrary to UN mandates). Did this terrorise the population of Iraq or not ?
Weapons of mass destruction were invented. Is this lying not the same thing as falsely justifying war ? What is that ???
Terrorism can be blamed on anyone. It has been virtually since 9/11. When will we wake up to false images and bogus claims made by corrupt media organisations ?
Terrorism is that which terrifies. What is more terrible than the impact of a state of emergency imposed on the free world by those who keep fuelling stories of a 'war on terrrorism'. People just want to live their lives in peace. Only the industrial military complex has any vested interests in fueling hatred worldwide. Anything that terrifies is, by definition, terrrorism regardless of where it comes from.
We all want security from invasion. Time to practice what we preach.
2006-08-01 16:03:51 · answer #2 · answered by democracynow 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
False. Terrorism is a tool to cause fear for political means, all governments use it in some forms. I think governments are currently a curse on humanity, however a curse that is currently a necessary evil. Hopefully societies will evolve past this need.
2006-08-01 16:28:54 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't think that Israel deliberately puts their women and children in the line of fire, the way that Hezbollah does; using them as human shields, the way that Hezbollah does; so that they will get killed and they can use foolish 'world opinion' to criticize their enemies, the way that Hezbollah does.
Hezbollah is the de facto government in control of Lebanon, or the legitimate Lebanese government would have kicked them out years ago. Their compliance with the terrorists shows who they take their orders from.
2006-08-01 14:48:59 · answer #4 · answered by cdf-rom 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Terrorism is very much like a cancer. And if you know anything about cancer you will know that sometimes when you attempt to beat it. All you accomplish is making it spread. Israel should defend itself but, I fear in doing so all there accomplishing is making Hezbollah stronger. I know that might sound dumb but for every civilian killed it creates anger in those left behind. And the loss of a loved one might just push those who were on the fence about Hezbollah right into there hands.
2006-08-01 14:46:48 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
This is a true statement. If we stop the war on terror and become blind to terrorism, life as we know it will end. We cannot just go through life allowing terrorists to prey on innocent people anymore. It is time to make an actual stand against them.
2006-08-01 14:53:33 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes terrorism must go. It's been allowed to fester and grow for too long. Get behind Israel. When they have taken out Hezbollah, be supportive of the 'innocent' Lebonese that remain. If terrorism is allowed back in, Hamas or others, take em out again.
2006-08-01 14:47:40 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
True but then you'd have to wipe out Isreal and the United States as they are the biggest terrorists and I can't imagine the world without the states.
2006-08-01 14:47:50 · answer #8 · answered by heavygambler.rm 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I agree that terrorism must be stopped. Murder is a curse on humanity. Killing sometimes must be done. Do you realize how bloody the Old Testament is? Israel and Judea fought with everybody.
2006-08-01 14:45:01 · answer #9 · answered by johngjordan 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Frankly I'm sick of the word terrorist in identifying the motivations of one group over that of another. Who or what is a terrorist is relative to whom is on the recieving end of what's being dished out and its so intended to effect people's emotions that it negates the fact that when it boils down to it we've got people fighting people and that people are getting killed as a result.
2006-08-01 14:47:01 · answer #10 · answered by Sonie 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Violence of any form is the cancer, and killing other human beings for this or that cause...Violence breeds violence. Attack begets retaliation and escalation of violence. Peace and justice can never be enforced or result from violece. Temporary peace without justice will inevitably lead to more wars..."True peace is not merely the absence of tension: it is the presence of justice" (Martin Luther King)
2006-08-02 00:21:03 · answer #11 · answered by FAINOMENON 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋