English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-08-01 12:14:03 · 24 answers · asked by Ricknows 5 in Politics & Government Law & Ethics

good ones keep um coming...by the way....leogirl, sorry I only agree with 1...lol.....and emucomp......dont take away my thump- no best answer chance for u2

2006-08-01 12:21:32 · update #1

24 answers

I don't fancy getting a lit butt in my face while driving with my top down from the car in front of me. But, getting killed by cell-phone talkers that just happen to be propelling 2000lbs @ 70mph is probably slightly worse. Hate to say it, but ban phone usage while driving.

2006-08-01 12:26:16 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 8 2

Here is an answer I gave to a question weeks ago about amending the Constitution.

Repeal and replace the 14th Amendment. Section 1 of the 14th has three consecutive clauses that are vague and have been misused and abused by the Courts so much that it makes me want to stay away from the ballot box for the rest of my life.

Constitutional law ought to constitute a set of rules so that government (the level of government being commanded) can know what it can or cannot do. Constitutional law ought to "provide guidance and discipline for the legislature, which is entitled to know what kind of laws it may pass," and it ought to "mark the limit of [the Court's] authority." (From Romer v. Evans, 1996; morally correct rhetoric but completely hypocritical in reality.)

Declare that the 14th is repealed (we obviously don't need the 2nd, 3rd, and 4th sections of it any more) and is replaced with more clearly stated rules for the states to obey.

In place of the Privileges and Immunities Clause, say that states must obey all provisions of the Bill of Rights except for the 2nd, 7th, and 9th amendments, and the Grand Jury Clause of the 5th.

Clarify that the Due Process Clause means exactly what it literally says and that, as Alexander Hamilton once said, it can never be applied to an act of the legislature (or voters). The Clause guarantees fair, standard PROCEDURES, not laws which judges deem acceptable.

Clarify that the Equal Protection Clause means only one thing: RACIAL equality. Not gender, not sexual orientation, not aliens, not equality for persons born out of wedlock, etc., etc.

The Supreme Court has been at its worst when: 1) it steals Presidential elections, 2) it enforces "unenumerated rights," and 3) picks out "minorities" other than racial minorites for "heightened protection."

"The current state of equal protection and fundamental rights is a travesty. The Court has drifted between different [clauses of the 14th] in deriving these rights as if they were so many coat hooks for the Court to use which-ever one is convenient. The various standards set out by the Court for deriving these rights are so vague as to be virtually useless. ... [T]he Fourteenth Amendment remains a hodgepodge of underdeveloped ideas." -- Evan Gerstmann, "Same-Sex Marriage and the Constitution," (2003) Cambridge University Press, pp 209-210.

2006-08-01 20:16:01 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I would like to see the new law that gives the police the ability to in pound a car of the person that has a suspended license.

i read in the paper a few days ago about a lady who lost her husband and her daughter because some drunk driver collided with their car, and he had his license suspended twice.

2006-08-01 19:20:26 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

That people who intend to chat or post on forums online are required to take a spelling and grammar test. People, your text is the only way others can characterize you online. Why characterize yourselves as illiterate idiots?

2006-08-01 19:21:01 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

In Oklahoma, if you are caught with indency with a child or statutory rape with a child 14 and under you are automatically sentenced to life in prison without parole. This should be done in every state. I am sick of seein these sick bastards out roaming around to do it over and over and over.

2006-08-01 19:18:33 · answer #5 · answered by PerfeclyImperfect 3 · 0 0

I would love for the law to pass that if anyone hires or houses an immigrant they get fined up the a@#.

2006-08-01 19:17:44 · answer #6 · answered by armiki66 3 · 0 0

Pants have to be pulled up and bucked around the waist. No more crotches around the knees and no more underwear showing.

2006-08-01 19:18:16 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

a law that helps immigrants 2 get there citizenship a whole lot faster

2006-08-01 19:19:08 · answer #8 · answered by *-*-DA QUEEN*-*- 2 · 0 0

I think it should be acceptable to bludgeon anyone walking through a store on a cell phone. Are you that important?????? Get over yourself.

2006-08-01 19:18:55 · answer #9 · answered by gimli_1977 3 · 0 0

I think that all people should have to keep their toenails super short! long toenails are gross!!

in seriousness, I think that gas should never go pass $1.00. the government can afford that!

2006-08-01 19:18:51 · answer #10 · answered by flutterflie04 5 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers