English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

9 answers

thats the same question

2006-08-01 11:47:05 · answer #1 · answered by Hellion 4 · 2 4

Acording to John Stuart Mill's "An Argument for the Death Penalty" it is better to let the guilty go free. Why? Because, in his words, it is better to let TEN guilty people go free than to send ONE innocent person to an unjust death.

If you want a perfect example of what he's talking about in this essay take, for instance, the American Judicial system. It works in such a way that it provides the accused every possible opportunity to go free. The accused is also deemed innocent until proven guilty beyond reasonable doubt. All of this is done to make sure that innocent people don't get the death sentence.

2006-08-01 19:36:51 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Punish the innocent, which is why I plan on being guilty!

2006-08-01 18:57:32 · answer #3 · answered by But why is the rum always gone? 6 · 0 0

Its better to let the guilty go free. Let God take care of them in the end.

2006-08-01 18:42:54 · answer #4 · answered by Linda 6 · 0 0

let the guilty go free with limitations.

2006-08-01 18:46:36 · answer #5 · answered by smithelliott 3 · 0 0

punish innocent

2006-08-01 18:41:47 · answer #6 · answered by Brittany R 3 · 0 0

Let the guilty go free. Karma is a b***h.......

2006-08-01 18:43:24 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Both should be avoided. The jury holds a great responsibility and should be righteous.

2006-08-01 18:43:22 · answer #8 · answered by ksri99 2 · 0 0

PEE ON THE GUILTY

2006-08-01 19:06:47 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers