Since he was being taken care of by the Bush administration...no, I don't think we will ever catch him. I think he had nothing to do with 9/11 and that it was a combination of the Bush family and administration along with Larry Silverstein who caused the next "Pearl Harbor" that allowed Bush to take the nation to war.
2006-08-01 11:53:59
·
answer #1
·
answered by keats27 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
It doesn't really matter, he has a 15 or 16 old son living in the Philippines who has been raised to hate all Americans. Americans don't get it, this isn't a war on terror, this is a religious war of massive proportions and it will never be over until the muslims overrun and wipe the rest of us out, i know i lived in a muslim country and they hate non muslims. Europe, America watch out. osama, al quaeda they are all the same. Muslims. Personally I think the saudis are our enemy. A local saudi teenager was spouting out the a school bus that Americans would weep tears and the American women were whores etc....
two days later 9/11 the next week he was back on the bus laughing about all the dead people..His family knew in advance what was going to happen, Saudis cannot be trusted.
2006-08-01 18:12:13
·
answer #2
·
answered by sapphire 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
The facts regarding the individuals who flew the jets into the trade center and the Pentagon are verified as fact. The involvement of Al Quaida is also verified fact. Osama Bin Ladin is the leader of that organization. Therefore the involvement is not open to any further speculation.
Now if you want to get past this issue and discuss the prior associations that Osama and Al Quaida had, then you have an interesting saga that could involve the US Government.
However the US Government is the best an obscuring fact and interrupting investigations that could lead to a different conclusion then the one they support (Kennedy Assassination). If we allow the possibility of senior US Officials having a relationship with Osama (GW Bush), then it is easy to see why Osama eludes capture. But in defense of the truth, I will say that Osama is a low profile character and his elusiveness is contributed by the fact that hundreds of thousands of middle eastern men resemble him and dress like him. He has many friends who hate the West, and the area he operates in has porous borders and hundreds of villages he can hide in.
2006-08-01 18:14:20
·
answer #3
·
answered by yes_its_me 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
I doubt it. As far as I know they haven't even been looking for him since the Iraq war began. I suspect that one of the real reasons why the war has dragged on for so long is that it makes a convenient distraction from the fact that there's been no real progress in the war on terror. It's a lot easier to declare war on another country than to hunt down individuals like Bin Laden, because these terrorists don't have any real national affiliation and move from country to country to stay hidden. Iraq was a much easier target (never mind the fact that there was no proven link between Iraq and Al Qaeda). It's the old "Do something even if it's wrong" philosophy. As long as it looks like the government is doing something, gullible people will feel like they're being protected.
The problem with going after countries rather than the terrorists themselves is that almost any country could unknowingly be a haven for terrorists. Should we declare war on ourselves because Timothy McVeigh was American? Obviously the idea is absurd, but no more absurd than they way the war on terror has been fought so far.
2006-08-01 18:25:24
·
answer #4
·
answered by ConcernedCitizen 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think if the government wanted him they would have him. I saw some stuff that purported to show how 9-11 was done with the government' help. It also said Bin Laden spent time in an American military hospital. The real enemy is Saudia Arabia. Most of the hijackers were from S.A. Someone asked (on Yahoo Answers) why people were against S.A. as they were our friends. I replied"They are not our friends, we are just their best customers".
2006-08-01 18:11:55
·
answer #5
·
answered by doggiebike 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
9/11 was not done by Al Quaeda, I don't believe. The TV told us that it was some muslims, the al quaeda and osama. Didn't everyone assume it was muslims when Timothy McVeigh was caught for blowing up the government building in Oklahoma?
2006-08-01 18:15:44
·
answer #6
·
answered by Pixel M 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
Where do you get this "We"
Osama is a Prince of Saudi Arabia he is Royalty. Royals are not subject to your laws. He will not be caught for any reason ever.
You should get down on your knees before Osama and ask for his mercy. Osama has done more for America than most people on this forum. He has provided jobs for Americans working at his weapons factories. And jobs is what Bush and this presidency is all about.
Go big Red Go
2006-08-01 18:08:38
·
answer #7
·
answered by 43 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
We will only find him when it becomes politically advantageous for the Republicans to do so. Think about this way. Osama is the only real face of terrorism that the US has to hold onto. If he is caught then the "War on Terror" can end. But since many Americans(Republicans, Dick Cheney for example) are making lots and lots of money from our continued efforts overseas, I see no reason for the military to actively seek out Osama.
2006-08-01 18:09:00
·
answer #8
·
answered by Kelly H 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think he is living in the white house with George Bush and Osama and Bush take turns drinking from Condi's cup. Or they will catch him and kill him in Oct. just before the election so that the repuglicans will win. Or they will blame Bill Clinton some more and try to win.
2006-08-01 18:06:27
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
First of all Osama Bin Laden is dead. Second if we "needed" to catch him it would have been 4 years ago. If he is cought the GAME IS OVER. So relax its a puppet show and US citizens are the audience, while our government is performing.
2006-08-01 18:14:09
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋