..and don't blame soldiers..hello? they carry out orders, only- it's the "decider" who gives the orders.
http://www.iraqbodycount.net/
2006-08-01 10:52:53 · 21 answers · asked by omnimog 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Those who kill for gain will get their just reward sooner, or later. They will not escape God's justice.
2006-08-01 10:57:47 · answer #1 · answered by WC 7 · 5⤊ 2⤋
It is unfortunate that there are people in the Middle East who are determined to defend despotism, radical fundamentalism, medieval mindsets, xenophobia, who are anti-democratic, anti-science, anti-women, anti-education, etc.
These people are killing others to try to maintain their heritage of hate.
To blame the USA for their deaths is a bit silly. The USA needs to be complimented for helping change the hate of the Middle East into compassion.
Disarm and get an education, a real education and not just an religious indoctrination.
2006-08-01 18:01:31 · answer #2 · answered by Alan Turing 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It's always about America Killing people. It doesn't matter how many innocent people that the terrorist kill, even in their own country. In war, innocent people die, I hate that, so I guess we are just suppose to sit by and say who cares, let's not get involved, and let them come and just destroy us all. If Clinton would have done his job in the first place, we wouldn't be at war, so don't blame Bush, it started way before he got in office!
2006-08-01 18:02:37 · answer #3 · answered by bama chick 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hey it is what they are good at so let them continue.
They have a very bad distribution of wealth and income in their country, they cause 25% of world global warming emissions and have elected a baboon two times in a row.
They are overweight, have no taste (watch their TV) and most countries hate them, so they should be allowed to kill their enemies (who grow at an alarming daily rate).
2006-08-01 17:58:49 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The more people we kill, the more stuff (like oil) there is for us. So who's side are you on? Them or us? Or are you one of those do-gooders, bleeding heart liberals, who doesn't believe what the decider tells the media to tell us? You know, there are new laws that make your quesion treason? I have nothing more to say to a disgusting criminal like yourself.
May Jesus forgive you!
2006-08-01 18:19:40 · answer #5 · answered by beast 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
That's right let the terrorist kill us first and just sit back and watch. Too bad you lost the last 2 elections. How about crying about something else you wiener.
2006-08-01 19:02:04 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
LOL........this is the question of the day! Congratulations. I guess if you are narrow and one sided in your views you may have a point. But most of us see both sides and believe we are saving lives. The more insurgents and terrorist we kill, the fewer civilians that die.
2006-08-01 17:59:06 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Is the U.S. deliberately targetting civilians? No.
Obviously you don't know what 'War' is buddy.
When they use a remote control IED to blow up a humvee, the marines blow the hell out of the surrounding area.
When they use bombs, not all bombs are accurate.
When they use artillery, not all artillery is accurate.
Learn War.
2006-08-01 17:56:55 · answer #8 · answered by pinkgoatwithmentalissues 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It's fine as long as you know the difference between killing and murder. You kill bad guys, but you murder the innocent. Our leaders are giving orders to kill.
2006-08-01 17:58:34 · answer #9 · answered by Thomas the Tank 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
300 deer per day, on the average have been hit by cars since 1986 in the US
2006-08-01 17:57:47 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Considering that for every terrorist or supporter or accidental victim we kill that our country feeds and medicates and supports another 10,000 worldwide? It can't be that bad.
2006-08-01 17:58:35 · answer #11 · answered by raiderking69 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋