Should I accept this trade for fantasy football?

Question

I give him Santana Moss, E. James, and Culpepper. I get Plummer, Barber, and Muhammed.

Edge James, Tiki Barber, Musin Muhammed, Jake Plummer

Answer 1

no - he is trying to anally rape you. just say no.

What upgrade do you see in your favor? None.

Edge v Tiki = push (I have them #5 and #6 in my ranking)
Santana v Mushin = not even close; muhammed should have never left the panthers - bears have no passing game - he's a bum!
Culpepper v Plummer = Culpepper - not as one-sided as Moss and Muhammed. There are questions about Dante's knee, but I wouldn't do this straight up, nevermind with the other parts of the deal.

Tell this guy to go screw someone else. You're not his *****.


update: I can't believe other people are telling you this is ok - it is not.

I am not the biggest S. Moss fan, but I would take him 100 times out of 100 over Mushin Muhammed. Are you people looking at his 2004 stats with Delhomme? He is in Chicago and has the tandom of Griese and Grossman tossing balls his way. Terrible!

Answer 2

I'd do it. I'm no Plummer fan, but I think there's a reason Culpepper got traded. Do you think they'd seriously let him go if he looked to be in good physical shape? The Dolphins have been in the QB quagmire ever since Dan the Man left, so they were willing to roll the dice, but that doesn't mean you have to.

I'd take Barber over James in a heartbeat. It's not even close. Tiki has just been proving everyone wrong now for what 4 years now? Don't write him off until he shows you he can't go anymore, and he's in such great physical shape, that's not happening. And don't let anyone give you that line about he won't get any goalline touches. Guess what? Neither will Edge, Denny Green never saw a goalline vulture he didn't like.

As far as the WR go, I'd hate getting Muhammed for any reason, but they can only go up from here. The good news is once your season gets started, there is ALWAYS a quality WR that pops up on the waiver wire. So if the WR part of the deal gives you the most concern, don't let it be one. I would see the other 2 as an upgrade, esp. RB.

Answer 3

Muhammed is better than Moss, Culpepper is better than Plummer although Denver has a better offense than Miami. And Tiki will probably score more than Edgerin James since he's on Arizona and they suck. I would make the trade.

Answer 4

Plummer is trash, and Cutler will be in before the year is out. Barber had his one great year and will come back down to earth. Muhammed had his good year two years ago. He was at Michigan State when I was, and let me tell you, that was quite awhile ago (read=he is well past his prime.) Santana will perform under what he did last year, but is probably an equal of Mushin. The Edge will get his touches and points, and C-Pepp will hit Chambers repeatedly in Miami. I'd hold off.

Answer 5

I'd do this trade. Culpepper's not exactly 100 percent yet, although reports out of Miami say he's close. Barber's already in a proven offense, and Moss and Muhammad cancel each other out, and Edge is going to a new team and a new offense, so who knows how he's going to produce. By all means, go for this trade

Answer 6

do no longer make THIS commerce. this could be a adverse deal for you. ingredient is regrettably on the incorrect team for his fading expertise. Curtis is solid, yet his production became scattered final season, no consistency. Tony G is going to be a stud like many times occurring, yet Dallas Clark isnt a bad replace in a pass first offense. Your adult males are solid guy, Portis would be a stud this twelve months, probable appropriate 5, def appropriate 10. Plax is a solid purple-zone probability, and Clark is solid like I suggested. keeps your peeps

Answer 7

NO. keep Culpepper. and it depends on which Barber?

Answer 8

It depends on what else you have. But its about an equal trade both parties are getting something good!

Answer 9

all 3 of what you giving are better than what your getting if you go by the positions

Answer 10

No way definetly dont do it.