English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

7 answers

Like, I dunno!

2006-08-01 09:52:42 · answer #1 · answered by Kwaz 2 · 1 1

I advise that the top shrink for contributions be accomplished away with, and that the optimal payouts in retirement nonetheless proceed to be as they are, adjusted for inflation. Social risk-free practices isn't a "supply away" application yet one that all of us make a contribution to love a coupon costs plan, and could be risk-free against different makes use of by the government. Do you compromise or disagree and why? in case you're so apprehensive approximately it then why do no longer you; first placed it decrease back into the interior maximum sector and make to have been no can take out money from it for his or her very own interest, 2nd pay decrease back each and every penny you have borrowed from the two Social risk-free practices and Medicare, third take the unlawful immigrants off of it and people who come over right here yet on no account paid a penny to it, and finally have it an identical for each guy or woman; in different words government officers are to take part in it and in the event that they want something greater they do it on their very own with out the tax payers investment it?yet, the economic stytem feeding the imbalances had on no account been truly replaced. They, a team of scholars, reported that one and all costs of interest could be 3% or much less for each guy or woman to grow to be prosperous if needed (that would desire to be genuine additionally to taces). the suitable financial difficulty could be, they suggested, while there have been no costs of interest. Why no longer attempt this answer? the prosperous could nonetheless be prosperous. My question is: while soial risk-free practices will become a difficulty related to federal expenditures, why no longer artwork with a balanced or income budget and spend no better than is supplied in, as any kin has to attempt for? Why no longer ban all loobying presents with a view to get regulations that serve the country? God bless united states of america.

2016-10-01 08:50:08 · answer #2 · answered by Erika 4 · 0 0

That's a really broad generalization! Have you read every question by every woman posted to YAHOO? And how would you really know if its a woman or not? Some of the avatar's are fake.

2006-08-01 09:31:05 · answer #3 · answered by tina m 6 · 0 0

Women are more social, therefore we talk more, use more words to get our point across.
Men are more "get to the point", therefore they talk less. "Just the facts."
Of course these are broad generalizations and do not apply to everyone.
Wow! I think that's my shortest answer yet! :)

2006-08-01 09:28:27 · answer #4 · answered by Tonya in TX - Duck 6 · 0 0

That's the difference in how the genders communicate.

2006-08-01 09:26:07 · answer #5 · answered by curiositycat 6 · 0 0

Obviously you've never seen any of Kevin's answers.

2006-08-01 09:37:41 · answer #6 · answered by Yarnlady_needsyarn 7 · 0 0

because women are emotional BASKET-CASES that will listen to ANY advice that ANY ASSHOLE gives them, then do the complete OPPOSITE.

2006-08-01 09:37:40 · answer #7 · answered by NONAME 1 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers