English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-08-01 06:51:48 · 6 answers · asked by rekha c 3 in Computers & Internet Other - Computers

or even the quality of bill clinton

2006-08-01 07:01:42 · update #1

6 answers

hi,

you can never compare a human's imaginative powers to another human, then how can you compare it to a machine?

anyway the question you asked is a very good one, making people think, here is my thought.,

The Smartest self aware computer today is having the brain capacity of a 4 year old human child... (comparing IQ and learning capability)
but it can compute faster than any machine on earth also, about 10 trillion procesess in a second, its not available to the public its called a 'purple apple' or somthing i dont remeber.

but we do hav promises that we will get robots as smart as a dolphin by the year 3000. unless you can find a way to write 13 billion lines of code in a single minute. there is no human programer capable of doing that... so we found a way to teach them, a new robot which can learn! it can study things by touching and experimenting (basic trial and error)... things we take for granted... like we know strings can pull but not push, it is impossible to incorporate it into a prosthetic brain...

but in a 1000 years robots will take baby-steps and grow like us ( copying data into a bigger machine) but its artistic capabilities is still a question,

but we hav promising results, a robot that paints beyond its primary programing of lines and curves... it mixes its own colours, machines that draw plans for houses if provided the total budget and area to builid....

AnswerMan

2006-08-01 07:08:31 · answer #1 · answered by The AnswerMan ? (J.L.A) 4 · 2 0

All these computers are man made - with no brains inside them. But Agatha Christee or any human being for that matter is god made with a super computer (both hardware and software - optly packed). So - Computers can never do what human beings did or does.

2006-08-01 23:37:46 · answer #2 · answered by deebeein 4 · 0 0

To be straightforward with you, I enjoyed it - yet then i like the charactors Tommy and Tuppence so it wouldnt count how undesirable the plot grow to be, identification in all probability nevertheless like it by using fact they are in it. I agree that the plot wasnt as sharp as with many different of Agatha's books (such as you, I actual have study all of them a minimum of as quickly as and function a minimum of one replica of each and every e book), yet i think of which you basically had to take a seat returned and luxuriate for the duration of this e book and not hardship too lots approximately its contents. It grow to be extra a comedy than a secret, with Tuppence using down the hill right into a monkey puzzle tree and so on, yet I do think of its a captivating e book, and after making plans and plotting 80 marvelous extraordinary books, shes allowed to place in writing one that is slightly extra sluggish. :)

2016-12-14 17:37:22 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

never. A computer is a logical device, and offers no thinking on it's own to be able to write those wonderful books

2006-08-01 07:00:12 · answer #4 · answered by benninb 5 · 0 0

when some one thinks doing that is worth it. But my guess would be 2245.

2006-08-01 06:56:02 · answer #5 · answered by Mike-Q 5 · 0 0

Same year when you start replying to my messages!! LOL!!!

2006-08-02 17:37:08 · answer #6 · answered by nice_libra_guy 6 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers