2006-08-01 06:37:18 · 4 answers · asked by bryan19956 1 in Arts & Humanities ➔ History
Now THAT, for some reason, is an interesting question.
I'll bet (as opposed to "I know", BTW) that their reliance on more casual dwellings of branch, mud and animal skin (all easily replaceable materials) reduced their concern to near zero.
Woodland tribes were nomadic, to refresh their local hunting grounds, and shelters tended to be both movable and disposable.
Even the Great Lodges of more permanently settled peoples were naturally "streamlined" and largely open to the elements.
That's my guess, anyway.
2006-08-01 06:55:10 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 1⤋
None, When the hurricanes came, the gods were angry. I have found no evidence of Native Americans altering their building techniques along the south east coast of the atlantic. Jack.
2006-08-01 06:58:20 · answer #2 · answered by genius vs. genius 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Easier to rebuild mud huts, than 20 story buildings. Also, when you have teepees you' can pack up and get out without being stuck on the freeway for 13 hours.
2006-08-01 06:45:24 · answer #3 · answered by Tamara C 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
none they moved inland remember when the English first got here they were amazed that the English would build settlements that close to the coast
2006-08-01 08:59:44 · answer #4 · answered by ryan s 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋