English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

15 answers

Not really.....Funny would be....

A guy walks into a psychiatrist office with a duck on his head...
Psychiatrist turns to the man and asks "can I help you?"
and the duck says.."yeah, get this guy off my a ss."

2006-08-01 08:23:43 · answer #1 · answered by Charlooch 5 · 0 1

Why would anybody ask why Bush the WAR CRIMINAL din`t bring freedom to Cuba?

The world doesn`t need Bush kind of freedom.

Bush is ineffective and he is the worst president ever.

Clinton cared more about the american people, he created jobs and got down the national debt.

2006-08-01 13:37:22 · answer #2 · answered by uglyone2002 1 · 0 0

Happy B-day to me!
Cake for everyone!

Bush makes,or has made,much more ostentatious claims in foreign policy than Clinton.I dont no why Bill Clinton dfidnt either!

100+ civilan casualties a day in Iraq is not "liberation",its the brink of civil war! Structural changes in Iraq are desperatly needed.
Thank you.

2006-08-01 13:23:33 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Hey, repuke, neither did Bush daddy, Reagan, nor anybody else since 1959, the only one to try anything at all was Kennedy and at that time it failed. Cuba holds no threat to us. We even have a base on the island so why kill thousands of innocent people like we have in Iraq. "Bush jr."

2006-08-01 13:23:43 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Yeah it is, They always point the finger at the person in charge at the time. The fogot all of the good Clinton days of agony. Letting Bin Laden go, The Ok city bombings. (You sure didn't here them complaining about his lack internal security), Waco, Uss Cole, The embassys in Africa.

2006-08-01 13:25:13 · answer #5 · answered by Boredstiff 5 · 0 0

Clinton didn't, Kennedy didn't, Regen didn't, Carter didn't, 47 years of didn't. If the Cubans really wanted to get rid of him, they would. You have to remember how bad the guy before him was.
Besides, without the former Soviet Union backing him, he isn't a flea on the butt of a dog.

2006-08-01 13:21:47 · answer #6 · answered by Spirit Walker 5 · 0 0

i'd ask why Bush didn't bring freedom to Cuba, but insisted on bringing it to Iraq

2006-08-01 14:01:19 · answer #7 · answered by nana 1 · 0 0

No because Bill Clinton was not about other countries and military, he was about our country , thats why we enjoyed what he did for this country and its economy, bush has destroyed it because he rather play world police, just to satisfy his weapons,oil, israel, and big coropations. while destroying the american way of life.

2006-08-01 13:29:48 · answer #8 · answered by cbb 2 · 0 0

Bill Clinton isn't president. They are asking the president why.

2006-08-01 13:21:11 · answer #9 · answered by hichefheidi 6 · 0 0

Clinton was to busy telling the gullible how great it was , to do anything worthwhile .

2006-08-01 13:33:21 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers