To all those who don't believe 9/11 was a conspiracy, why do you say there are no facts to support the theory

Question

People, if you still buy the official story of 9/11, you really need to do your homework. I'm not a conspiracy cookball. I am a college educated, skeptical, right-wing adult. I even voted for Bush, and it makes me sick to my stomach to think I did so. We need to make everyone aware of what's happening before it's too late. If you haven't already done so, you need to investigate the following:

- What is the scientific explaination for WTC7 falling - or, for that matter, WTC1 & 2 - directly on top of themselves, straight down, at free-fall speed?

- What has been the history between the Bush's and the Bin Ladin's?

- Why did Larry Silverstein place terrorist-specific insurance on the WTC buildings directly before the attacks?

- Why have we not captured Bin Ladin? Why are we not even going after him?

- Why was demolition-specific chemical found within the debris of WTC7?

There are so many others. We need everyone to put this puzzle together.

Answer 1

It seems to me(judging by the reactions to your question) that people don't think that something like this could happen in the U.S. No one so far has tried very hard to disprove what you have to say, and their answers, IMHO, have been pretty pathetic. Why haven't they started the impeachment process? Are you serious? Don't say something like that and then expect us to listen to anything else that you have to say....Pancaking? First the steel has to melt, right?...I could go on, but talking about this makes me sick. I'm glad that someone else is aware of what is going on.

P.S. Does the fact that the last two elections were stolen have anything to do with 9/11? I think it does.

Answer 2

As a left wing nut who NEVER voted for push I will explain.

- What is the scientific explaination for WTC7 falling - or, for that matter, WTC1 & 2 - directly on top of themselves, straight down, at free-fall speed?

called pancaking, popular mechanics explained it. What you witness was not a bottom failure and fall, but a floor by floor failure. Where the planes hit, those floors were destoryed. The weight above cause the top floors to crush the damaged floor, this in turn caused the top to fall upon the floors just below where the planes hit, these floors now have two must weight and buckle falling to the next. You think you only say one building failure when in fact you witness about 300 indiviual failures.

- What has been the history between the Bush's and the Bin Ladin's?

Perhaps you should researched this before voting hmmm Anyway, Bush has ties to the Bin Ladens through there oil holdings BUT Osama is pretty much teh black sheep of the Bin clan. Bush knows like Osamas second uncle, a little dicey for me, which is why I am left wing.

- Why did Larry Silverstein place terrorist-specific insurance on the WTC buildings directly before the attacks?

I have never heard this before. I will say that Silverstein had to sue to get that insurance paid, you'd think a grand conspiracy would have had a clause for liquated damages...

- Why have we not captured Bin Ladin? Why are we not even going after him?

Bin Ladin has been trained by Russian and US forces on how to evade capture and execute guerllia tactics against a superpower. He is now doing just that. He knows our secerts and he knows what we couldnt stop the Russians from doing. This guy is like if Lex Luthor and Wonder Women had a baby, would you really be shocked that Wonder Luthor could evade the Justice League?

- Why was demolition-specific chemical found within the debris of WTC7?

What chemical is "demolition-specific" and assuming there is, is this chemical a byproduct? A plane did hit a building, there possibly possibly enough heat and enegry and agitated to cause some chemical reactions.

My question to you: if this was a conspiracy why did they leave so many ends untied? surely a massive plan such as this would have planning. By this logic, surely OJ was framed.

And my LAST proof this wasnt a conspiracy. Due to 9/11 the Prez was redirected to Louisiana. NO WAY IN HELL would the president ANY PRESIDENT agree to ANY conspiracy where he would have to spend more than 5 minutes in Louisiana. Now, had he, just so happened had to go to Vegas, Id be more receptive.

Answer 3

I see you like Michael Moore. It's like this have you ever read a poll? Sure. The first question that you have to ask is who took the poll? Why did they take the poll? What were the objectives of the pollster? Anybody can draw any conclussion from anything, given the "correct" circumstances. Let me ask you this. If these things are true how come Bush and Co aren't hanging from a yardarm someplace and this whole country is not in a revolution? Wouldn't the democratic party brought this up in the last election?
If this stuff was true, they would have had the republican party by the short hairs, yes? It seems a bit fishy to me that they didn't use it for reelection, there has been no impeachment process in Congress. There have been no trials, executions, or hangings. The reason that they haven't caught Butt Laden is because he is hiding in a freakin cave in the middle of no mans land, eating camel dung over a smokeless camp fire.

So you need to reexamine your resources and find out wha they gain.

Answer 4

Do some research.

If you want to know why the towers fell the way they did read about structural engineering. The towers were supported by a central system which was compromised by the intense heat from the thousands of gallons of jet fuel which were burning. Once a few of the floors were destroyed it caused a pancake effect where each of the upper floors collapsed onto the ones below it. That is the reason they fell straight down.

If you don't think we are going after Bin Ladin then why is he the most wanted man in America. I am pretty sure they don't give that status away as a consolation prize. I am sure there are quite a few servicemen who are in harms way at this very moment trying to track him down. In fact I am friends with a few of them.

If you actually did some research you would find that this conspiracy theory is a bunch a bs floated by the extreme fringes of the political spectrum to achieve their goals. There is absolutely no factual basis to support it and only a small, loose-knit group of coincidences keeping it together.

They changed the definition of gullible.

Answer 5

If you had been watching as I was, the engineers and scientist have already discussed the design that allowed the building to fall as it did. Bush has been after Bin Laden for a long time. In fact clinton had the opportunity to get him too, does that mean old bill is part of this too? We had been receiving non credible threats for years, what is the date of the policy.
Why would we be privy as to what our government is doing in the way of tracking bin laden. If we know, don't you think they would know? Use some sense.
You are wasting your time and energy on something that the terrorist did, nothing more, nothing less. I personally have better things to think about.

Answer 6

How in the Hell can someone say we are not chasing Bin Laden because we are to busy with Iraq? Bin Laden was responsible for the worst terrorist attack in U.S history.

What the Hell does it take to get Bush to actually want to capture someone. Oh I know, how about the leader of a country that is loaded with oil.

The Bush family and the Bin Laden family have connections even to this day. Lets face it folks Bush doesn't want Bin Laden because Bin Laden is Bush's Boogey man.

Bush can use Bin Laden whenever he wants to scare America into giving up their freedoms. Bush can use Bin Laden too scare people into voting Conservative this fall. Expect the terror alert system to make a comeback. Expect Bin Laden to conveniently release a tape threatening America around election time.

If you want some good proof of what went on on 9/11 and what Bush is up too click on this link http://prisonplanet.com/

Answer 7

Because anyone can find any fact to support any point of view. It's called being a "spin doctor". What you do is look at all of the facts, and speak about the ones that solely support your view.

Hell, I could take the facts of 9/11 and make the argument that aliens really destroyed the towers!

So to your theory I say believe whatever you want. But by doing so, you are disrespecting the people that lost their lives that day and their families. To me that is more offensive than WHY it all happened. I don't think that even GW would stoop to killing thousands of his fellow countrymen to make himself look good.

Go back to your comic books and action figures. . .

Answer 8

Thank God! Who are you? And please share your research with me. I am just like you...I am a college student, Republican, staunch conservative, voted for Bush, fan of Sean Hanitty, etc. But I have been stumbling onto some tidbits here and there. This isn't Michael Moore stuff, either. He was a dishonest cook. However, there are many things about this that don't add up. And so far, I haven't been able to find a conservative to discuss this with. I knew the government allowed pearl Harbor to happen, but this caught me way off guard. I don't necessarily have my mind made up, so I would be very grateful if you would check out my group, http://groups.yahoo.com/group/jrconservatives and go further into detail.

Answer 9

There are no facts to support conspiracy theories. Just because some video on the internet says "this is a fact" does not mean it is. The puzzle is put together, I'm sorry if you are duped by idiots that believe their own drivel. The link below is one of many that debunk all the stupid conspiracy theories.

Answer 10

I dont pretend to know everything about 9/11 but i would say that the reason they are not chasing Bin Ladin is because they are too preoccupied with Iraq. And they claim that is them trying to find him.