English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

i still cant believe they didnt get him at the draft the jets need a new running back curtis martin is getting old he not as good as he use 2b i dont even no why there traded lamont jordan is way better running back then martin in matter of fact i think they should bring back keyshawn johnson ,lamont jodan , john abraham,coles

2006-08-01 05:21:08 · 8 answers · asked by jayare a 1 in Sports Football (American)

8 answers

LOL,REGGIE BUSH SIGNED A 62 MILLION DOLLAR CONTRACT,he aint goin nowwhere,and more important the jets need a quarterback,chad pennington has never played a full season,patrick ramsey sux,and brooks bollinger thats just a joke,the jets could of went after edgerrin james but chose not to,thomas jones from the bears is who i think the jets will end up with,i should do this for a living lol

2006-08-01 05:26:09 · answer #1 · answered by cote8377 2 · 0 0

Curtis Martin is old but they got rid of Lamont Jordan the same year Martin won the rushing title. He just had a nagging injury last year. He should be back this year and put up good numbers. And there's no chance of getting Reggie Bush, that contract was freaking huge. If they traded him now they'd have so many cap problems in a few years.

2006-08-01 07:03:06 · answer #2 · answered by logan s 2 · 0 0

Reggie Bush signed with the Saints. Done Deal. The Jets would have needed to move up in the draft to get him.

As for "Reggie Busch" is he the heir to Budweiser?? Maybe they can sign him.

2006-08-01 06:34:22 · answer #3 · answered by endosmoka 3 · 0 0

Now listen, trying to get reggie Bush from the saints is like trying to take away a chicken leg from an ethiopian. It ain't going to happen.

2006-08-02 20:02:22 · answer #4 · answered by Tony 2 · 0 0

you dont know much about football do you? you actually thought that the jets had a chance at picking up bush?LOL.

2006-08-01 07:30:06 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

he already signed the contract

2006-08-01 08:01:01 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

no dude, the deal is on ice

2006-08-01 05:24:54 · answer #7 · answered by jim 3 · 0 0

deal done

2006-08-01 06:15:51 · answer #8 · answered by kukamongakid 3 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers