English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-08-01 04:33:44 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture Other - Society & Culture

9 answers

For it, with caution. I think that God intended for all the races of the world to come together, but we have to be careful about exploitation.

2006-08-01 04:39:39 · answer #1 · answered by Brigid O' Somebody 7 · 0 1

Globalisation is a series of linkages forming a union on a global scale between two or more separate groups.
Globalisation on one hand, is Homogonism. Macdonalds... everywhere becoming the same and being bought out by the same companies, expanding their branches of power into similar, demographically, economically viable areas.

The internet on the other hand is already a medium and the actuallisation of a form of globalisation. Anybody can interact with other people, advertise an interest, sell a product- it is a virtual world of need/supplied information- the most egalitarian way in history of providing cheap information.

In many ways globalisation will prove unsustainable because of the energy crisis, market saturation overseas etc giving way to a way of life that is summed up as localisation, the opposite, which is an idea I welcome because that is what the world was like for the whole of history before the industrial revolution. The world is small enough without people flying on planes at so many thousand a second etc. Where is the respect for the absolute spatial limits we are limited to on this planet? We must realise that we share with millions of other people, globalisation is advantageous to the few, packaging all the earths resources and space and marketing everything right here and now. What about the rest of the people? What happens when they want what everyone else has? Globalisation is Unsustainable and selfish, shortsighted and a root cause for many of our most serious world issues today.

2006-08-01 12:04:51 · answer #2 · answered by syelark 3 · 0 0

Definately against, those who are pushing the world toward globalisation are doing it for total power and control over the masses, life is supposed to be about differences and being able to experience those differences, once NWO is in place they will force everyone towards living the way they want you too, a complete loss of rights and freedom. Globalisation really means new world order, all the countries of this planet ruled by 1 government are control by the illuminati.

2006-08-01 12:00:35 · answer #3 · answered by commonxsense2005 3 · 0 0

I am for it rather than against , because it is very important to co-oporate with each other regardless of the border of countries. The more people know each other the more they can accept,too. The earth is not very big and it is inevitable to have contact with each other.

Historically it is certain that countries which share their border or were close to each other fought against one another. And people who live in the same area or place bring about conflicts.That is because they live close and know each other.However those sooner or later could often happen and if they do they have to be stopped and solved after all by knowing one another.

Globalization makes people all over the world know each other and people's value must quite often clash but that is very important to find out the way to admit in such circumstance. So I agree with globalization.

2006-08-01 12:26:08 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Definitely against it. Can you imagine being forced to put up with a bunch of islam terrorist who want nothing but to kill you. Also, it brings down the standard of living for most countries who are more economically advanced. Many countries such as the ones in the middle east and Africa are too backwards to progress with the rest of the world.

2006-08-01 12:35:07 · answer #5 · answered by swcasper2001 4 · 0 0

It depends what definition you use. It can be used in a positive or negative context. I'd support a more interconnected world but in the context of capitalists taking over with corporations, I am totally against, which is the definition which is used more often these days.

2006-08-01 11:42:59 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

It started with the United Nations. We need to strengthen the powers involved in all nations saying how the world is to be designed...not just one nation.

2006-08-01 11:41:40 · answer #7 · answered by jmmevolve 6 · 0 0

what ever the scum govenments of the world are for, im against

2006-08-01 13:05:16 · answer #8 · answered by archaeologia 6 · 0 0

for

2006-08-01 11:46:43 · answer #9 · answered by thebigtombs 5 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers