English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

If someone makes a statement about an ethnic group and it is true but the ethnic group didn't like it, would that make the person who made the statement prejudiced?

2006-08-01 04:31:13 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Arts & Humanities Philosophy

9 answers

Prejudiced means to pre-judge. If someone were to say something about a group that was true, I would not call that prejudiced, I'd call it FACT.

2006-08-01 04:39:44 · answer #1 · answered by pamspraises 4 · 0 0

There is a HUGE difference between fact and slander. But even if something is true, the way in which it is stated can at times be seen as prejudiced. For example, to someone of a Scottish background, hearing themselves described as skirt-wearing, eaters of sheep innards, might seem offensive. In fact, many a nose has been punched because of just such a description. But in fact, some Scotsmen do wear skirts (kilts) and
Haggis (made from sheep innards, oatmeal and other odds and ends) is the national (or at least traditional) dish of the Highland Scots.
Prejudice would be looking at all Scots and assuming they all wore skirts (not kilts, just skirts) and all ate haggis all the time, and refusing to notice that some wore pants, and some ate steaks.

2006-08-01 12:27:43 · answer #2 · answered by old lady 7 · 0 0

If I said that Afro-Americans have a higher chance of developing high blood pressure (than other ethnic groups), this is not insulting and does not make me prejudice. It is a medical fact.

I am not prejudice. If an Afro-American does not like the above statement, that still does not make me prejudice.

2006-08-01 11:40:28 · answer #3 · answered by Patti C 7 · 0 0

There is not one statement that can be made that would be true for all the members of any group. All apples are not red, in fact, all apples are not even apples. If fruit can be that complicated then prudence would encourage silence over statements where people are concerned.

2006-08-01 13:15:53 · answer #4 · answered by Liligirl 6 · 0 1

That very much depends on HOW and in which context the speaker woud say it. But general reaction would be yes I think even when you would know it's not true.But if the speaker wouldn't mean it that way, he would have to be ready explain and defend his statment over and over again. Sometimes SO hard to do :)

2006-08-01 11:38:59 · answer #5 · answered by aaja 3 · 0 0

Generalisations are rarely, if ever, true so it is best not to use them if they can be avoided. When applied to people Generalizations are quite often offensive. If you said that all ...... are geniuses, then you might not get a negative reaction. But if you said that all ...... don't wash enough, chances are you might get some trouble.

2006-08-01 11:56:06 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

It's prejudice only if he was not from the ethnic group he was criticizing.

2006-08-01 12:33:34 · answer #7 · answered by truthyness 7 · 0 0

No, Just ask Jimmy The Greek.lol.

2006-08-01 15:45:09 · answer #8 · answered by genius vs. genius 1 · 0 0

No. It just depends on what context.

2006-08-01 11:50:38 · answer #9 · answered by tiger_skratch 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers