In fantasy football,is it better to assign 4 points for a passing touchdown,or 6 points.And why?

Answer 1

def. depends on what kind of system you use..if you include int's against the qb, then 6. if you don't minus points for ints 4.

Answer 2

either way is ok, but usually you adjust the yardage points as well:

4 pts for a passing TD + 1 pt/ 20 yards passing

or

6 pts for a passing TD + 1 pt/ 25 yards passing

These two pretty much equal out usually. However, if you get a league where it s 6 and 20, that makes your QB more valuable than other leagues, and you may want to move Manning up on your draft board.

Answer 3

6 because it's better to keep the fantasy games as realistic as possible. Every passing or running TD you get, you get 6 points in the actual game of football (1 point for the kicker for EP). 4 is just a random number to have to have as a touchdown score, it's like using water for cereal instead of milk.

Answer 4

Always do 6 points regardless of yards.

6 for the RB, 6 for WR, 6 for the Def, 6 for the TE, 6 for anyone.

People have their reasons for 4 but let the TD value be consistent between positions since yards never are consistent.

6 for the QB just like everyone else.

Answer 5

Doesn't really matter. It's all about preference. Some people like 4 points for passing TD's because it sort of "levels" the playing field between positions.

Answer 6

you gotta go with 4 pts for a passing td and 6 pts for a rushing td- otherwise in ur draft ull have all this crap with qbs going in the first round when they belong in the 3rd or 4th- rbs deserve to get more pts than qbs

Answer 7

I don't think it really matters if everyone gets the same points for a TD as the other teams for their QB

Answer 8

6, it's worht 6 in the NFL y change it just cause it's a pass