Village...as long as I can have my husband with me for the full 100 years.
2006-08-01 03:13:47
·
answer #1
·
answered by doc 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
I'll take 100 or 65 in a village over 100 or 65 in the city.
2006-08-01 10:13:56
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
100 in a village
2006-08-01 12:55:24
·
answer #3
·
answered by Suzanne 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
100 years in a village
2006-08-01 10:16:18
·
answer #4
·
answered by candidworker 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
65 years in a city cuz if i was to live 100 yrs in a village, i'd b too old to enjoy life starting at the age of 70
2006-08-01 10:27:05
·
answer #5
·
answered by filipina279 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
65 in the city. I get bored to easily to live in a village.
2006-08-01 10:53:12
·
answer #6
·
answered by geni 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
65 in a city
2006-08-01 10:14:48
·
answer #7
·
answered by baby girl 326 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
65 in a city
2006-08-01 10:14:40
·
answer #8
·
answered by jamale f 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
65 in a city
2006-08-01 10:13:26
·
answer #9
·
answered by shae 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
100 years in a village because I think you would live a more calm and rewarding life. People that live in cities tend to lead a more stressful life, and spend less time with their families.
2006-08-01 10:18:43
·
answer #10
·
answered by Mary J 4
·
0⤊
0⤋