2006-08-01 03:06:21 · 26 answers · asked by tkuzz 3 in Sports ➔ Basketball
KG is. He has the most experience and he plays like an all-star every season. Dwight Howard, being a rookie, isn't as good as KG yet, but perhaps he might be one day. Amare's injury sets him back some, and KG is the sole leader of his team, whereas Amare has Nash.
2006-08-01 03:18:27 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Garnett is the best among the three players ,Garnett is a very intelligent player , excellent low post moves, Has a nice permiter game, Can ran the floor like a point guard, A very good defender and can occasionally drain the open three, Stoudemire needs to mature as a player , but he is all power inside the shaded lane and the steve nash factor also made stoudemire a better player.Dwight Howard a future all star has good upper body strenght a rebounding demon but still needs to mature
2006-08-08 02:37:30 · answer #2 · answered by Turero 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
One by one
KG-One of the best players in the league fierce rebounder, great scorer and is only what, 31? By far the best pf in the game He makes everyone better
Stoudamire-Young, great, and the future However he missed almost all of last year. He is a very goood scorer but an average rebounder. He is a very good player but still young and foolish
Howard- Only going into his 3rd year he is dominant great rebounder but still nedds to work on scoring he just doesn't get the attention he deserves because he plays on the magic in the east. howard is still not the team leader and before he does that is is the worst of the three.
The Verdict: KG-Nobody does better than Garnett, he is hands down the best power fprward in the league 20 pts 15 rebounds and 5-6 assists a night is too good to deal with
2006-08-01 04:30:02 · answer #3 · answered by ~~Slim Shady Rocks~~ 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
OK. Let's break them down one by one.
Garnett is obviously the more accomplished between the three because he has the most number of seasons played and thus granting him more professional level experience. He even had post season taste wherein they reached the Conference Finals and was said to be One Troy Hudson away from reaching the Finals. (Because of their abuse on Shaq's disability to guard the pick and roll)
Garnett didnt immediately create an impact on the NBA but when he was inserted during the middle of the season, he led the team in blocks which showed flashes of his on court brilliance. He is an excellent rebounder, defender, passer, and can stretch the floor with his outside shooting. He has lead the league several times in terms of efficiency and it is said that he is one of the most complete players in the league. (Can play all five positions if needed)
On the other hand. Amare Stoudemire has improved his game during his second season (yes, his own improvement was stronger than the Nash effect) and showed us that he has bread and butter scoring plays that almost always guarantee a bucket. He is also one of the best finishers in the game with his ability to quickly run up and down the court. His defense is still a question mark since we haven't seen him be really consistent because he has only played 2 full seasons. That said, he has the potential to become the scoring champ but I personally feel that if the team lacks certain pieces, his productivity might be a hanging issue.
Dwight Howard, in terms of upside, has of course the most among the 3. He is the youngest to average a double double in a season and even the youngest to tally 20 points and 20 rebounds. He is a rebounding machine and is often compared to Hakeem because of his inside presence offensively and defensively. Nicknamed the Man Child, I think we can see this guy flourish and become one of the top stars in the league, given that he improves his outside shooting ala Garnett.
To answer. Garnett is the best among the three followed by obviously Amare. Give Dwight years. Who knows how monstrous he could be. Dont count out Amare too because of his unique face up attacking play, he may also be a very unstoppable offensive force.
2006-08-01 03:25:06 · answer #4 · answered by JCC 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Kevin Garnett; Can play every position. Six time All-NBA and All-defensive. Eight time All-Star. Recieved the NBA MVP two years ago. Oh and, he's the best rebounder in the NBA.
Dwight Howard is a freak talent, but no one has the length of KG and Howard is still rough on his offensive skills.
Amare Stoudimire was the best center in the NBA for one season, then he had the surgery. Now we don't really know how good he is.
2006-08-01 03:39:52 · answer #5 · answered by Big Z 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Garnett
2006-08-08 14:05:27 · answer #6 · answered by soula28_2000 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Hmm... Dwight Howard. You can count Stoudamire out because no player that has undergone microfracture surgery has ever returned with their full mobility, speed and explosiveness (example: Chris Webber). KG is a lot more versatile but he's a lot older too. Dwight Howard is already so good now I mean getting 20+ pts and 20+ rebs 2 times? that's nuts. The sky's the limit for him.
2006-08-01 04:28:58 · answer #7 · answered by #15mwu 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Kevin Garnett cause he makes his team better. He is better and is a much better defender. Id take kg for 2 more years then Howard
2006-08-01 03:26:48 · answer #8 · answered by gg 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Stoudemire. The reports are saying that he's added a jumpshot, better ball-handling, and improved passing to his game to go along with his inside game. I think he's the best. Mostly b/c Howard is still developing and KG isn't a game finisher.
2006-08-01 06:05:43 · answer #9 · answered by 13 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Amare Stoudemire definitely
2006-08-02 12:05:02 · answer #10 · answered by jarron_mckinley 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋