2006-08-01 02:55:01 · 9 answers · asked by gracechang86 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Government
Yes. Quality of life should be the most important aspect of the choice. Since this country has a separation of church and state. then religious positions on it are unimportnat.
2006-08-01 02:58:45 · answer #1 · answered by ceprn 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Euthanasia is a world wide movement and not in USA only. The final decision in the matter will ultimately depend on the general world view . This view appears like the proverb 'willing to harm but afraid to strike. But the fear has nothing to do with lack of bravery but the even widening medical knolwledllge Just imagine that some patients is put to sleep today and the next day a remedy comes up which could have reversed the sickness, Even if the doctors attending the euthanasia are above law, if they are worth the sale of their profession they may suffer pangs of conscience . If he is weak in resolution he might even go mad.
So it is advisable for all to go slow in the matter.which includes USA.
2006-08-01 03:05:34 · answer #2 · answered by Prabhakar G 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
you're puzzling what's culturally frequently happening with what's black and white criminal. Many places interior the U. S. have not got, have under no circumstances had, or only have not got efficient regulations against straightforward nudity. that's no longer against federal regulation and states in many cases circulate away it to close by governments to bypass such regulations. and various of alternative do no longer hassle. So why isn't nudity greater hassle-loose? straightforward... because of fact the technique of life does not settle for it in maximum places, and the place it does settle for it, that's no longer a brilliant deal. it particularly is why there are generic and left on my own nude seashores in some places, no count if or no longer they are technically criminal or no longer. the place nudity isn't frequently happening, the regulation only cites for stressful the peace or applies another imprecise ordinance. subject "solved". people who dare take area at a nude coastline or at a private nudist venue immediately learn that they honestly get used to nudity and in many cases come to like it. The etiquette of sitting down on something you further (in many cases a towel) is immediately discovered and solves any challenge with hygiene (a minimum of to an identical degree wearing outfits does). Be that because it ought to, i do no longer anticipate the final lifestyle to settle for it in all circumstances. somewhat, as others have stated, the ecu style is a lot greater in all probability and is the wonderful compromise.
2016-12-10 19:22:54 · answer #3 · answered by shery 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Perhaps we should consider time limits on life support if there is no visible sign of life after a certain time frame (unless otherwise requested by the patient). It would be a good start.
2006-08-01 03:00:06 · answer #4 · answered by E Y 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
IMO, thats something the gov shouldn't involve its self in, that should be left to the Doctors and patients
2006-08-01 02:57:41 · answer #5 · answered by sealss3006 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes! We put an animal that is terminally ill or injured out of its misery, why should humans have to suffer?
2006-08-01 02:57:58 · answer #6 · answered by AsianPersuasion :) 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, it would be better. But, Govt. should keep vigilance, so that this is not misused.
2006-08-01 03:18:37 · answer #7 · answered by Electric 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
only if george w bush is the first
2006-08-01 03:00:37 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
no but it will always happen.
2006-08-01 02:57:36 · answer #9 · answered by Harezichi 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋