English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

23 answers

israel is not pursuing a policy of genocide, not annexing its neighbours' territory, and has certainly not yet abolished democracy (israel is the only fully suffragal state in the near east).

israel was attacked, and has retaliated (probably with excessive force).

if you want to see a state which undertakes illegal invasions and slaughters people at random (in hugely larger numbers than israel has come close to) try the usa.

2006-08-01 02:59:24 · answer #1 · answered by synopsis 7 · 0 1

No, Hitler created a genocide and invaded numerous countries in Europe for the fact to gain power. Hilter wasn't attacked by neighboor countries or orginzations from neighbooring countries. Isreal is taking care of business just how they should. They have to stand up and let the region know that they wont sit idle (like the world wants them to) while their people and soldiers are kidnapped, killed, and terrorized. If anything Hezbolouh as an orginization is more like Hitler but really none of them are Hitler so I don't see the connection.

2006-08-01 09:39:51 · answer #2 · answered by ESPforlife 2 · 0 0

That's ridiculous. Israel is not annexing any of its neighbors, forming global alliances with totalitarian regimes, invading and conquering other countries, or promoting a fascist and racist political ideology built on a concept of racial purity and superiority.

A reasonable person can deliver a very well-conceived criticism of Israel's current policies and actions, and even make reasonable accusations about the idea that there is some level of racism operating behind them.

Criticize Israel all you like, and there is good reason to, but the Hitler/Nazi comparison does not hold water.

2006-08-01 09:35:56 · answer #3 · answered by zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz 4 · 0 0

I think there is some truth to that but Israel drops notices about 5 hours before they bomb...hitler gave no warning. History does repeat itself though...they already have thousands of lebanese and palestinian people in their jails but unlike hitler i dont believe they are killing them all at the same time. There are similarities but there are big differences.

2006-08-01 09:36:07 · answer #4 · answered by omsuperhoops 3 · 0 0

Ridiculous! At what point was Hitler defending Germany from terrorist attacks when he violated the sovereignty of Czechoslovakia, or Poland, or Finland, or France, or Britain, or Russia? How does Hitler's naked acts of aggression compare to Israel's completely justified protection of her rights as a nation?

2006-08-01 09:36:42 · answer #5 · answered by nacmanpriscasellers 4 · 0 0

Yeah & the same thing that happened to the Native Americans too. Where do you think Hitler got the idea from? You guessed it...from watching the white man perform genocide on the Native Americans! Think about it.

2006-08-01 09:34:59 · answer #6 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Israel is protecting itself from acts of war already committed against it....

You are an idiot if you think that's what Hitler did.

2006-08-01 09:55:54 · answer #7 · answered by scruffy 5 · 0 0

If Hezbollah is hiding among the civilian, then certainly Israel is hiding behind innocent and ignorant Americans. Thats even scarier.

2006-08-01 13:00:23 · answer #8 · answered by eagleeye 2 · 0 0

You are wrong. Israel has gone out of its way to war civilians to get out of the way. The problem is that Hezbollah hides among innocent civilians so when Israel "dares" to defend itself innocents are killed along with Hezbollah.

2006-08-01 10:34:20 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Hitler attacked first .

Your saying that France should not have fought back , when Hitler attacked them .
Or England ?

If I walk up and punch you in the face, are you going to defend yourself or cry to your Mommy ?

Hezbullah started it , let them take their lumps .

2006-08-01 09:40:36 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers