Is the US the only country that understands why there is a need to kill Islamic Militants?

Question

Today's world wants to be all lovey dubby and let everyone do what they want without accountability. I think you have to address a threat when it's small or else it will become big. No UN peace keepers will stop the hatered flowing from the Ji-Had inspired muslims. Nor will they stop the repeaded attacks on Israel, the US, and other western countries. I think the only option we have is violence/war, sometimes unfortunantly thats all you can do if you want to survive. I wish it wasn't that way but I don't see peace talks and economic sanctions changing a culture.

Note: To all lebonese in the cross fire, if your father/husband has sholder fire missles and an Ak-47 you might want to flee. I have no sympothy for people being displaced! I do feel bad that incocent people have been killed but when your town is a battlefield, if your not fighting get the hell out.

Answer 1

Those 5-year old children killed by American bombs dropped by the jews were obviously dangerous Islamic Militants.

Answer 2

Maybe against islamic militants but again labeling them jihadist are wrong. Imagine for a moment you have lost your sonm your mother, your father, your sister, your dog, your home, everything. All of which taken from you suddenly and by a force supposedly fighting for freedom. What would do and where do you think god will come into play? Revenge is a dangerous thing and these people are not jihadist. The unfortunate labeling of suicide bombers and jihadist is unfairly putting people in groups and misrepresenting a religion. Suicide bomber is just that, a suicide bomber. Some unfortunate fool who lost everything. Hezbollah is not a Islamic militant organization either. Another unfortunate label the media colorfully decided to tag on so that a correlation can be drawn between them and Al-qaida. To envoke sympathy for the israeli government. Hezbollah is a resistance movement that has arms strickly for defensive purposes. The kidnapping of the 2 israeli soldeirs was a defensive measure because isreal has been kidnapping people for years. Peace talks can help but its going to take time and a huge compromise. But it is possible.

Answer 3

I love how some people think if we just sit around and press flowers there will be peace in the world.

Militants are uneducated masses pressed into acts of violence to fund criminal enterprise.

I don't know what’s sadder..

the idiot that falls for the call to Allah to kill kids because he has never seen the inside of a school..

or the money hungry gang leader that uses Allah to extract money from governments to run drugs and guns while talking innocents into killing themselves. Al quada.

Then again the pink patrol activists, and other anti war people are the saddest.. they cut America’s power just when we start to fight against them.

Like to send them down a gang street in New York, and see if they think we should get rid of cops because they are so violent.

Answer 4

Until we address the real problems of why countries come under the attack terrorist organizations we will forever be fighting them over there so we don't have to fight them over here. Which is the dumbest slogan I have ever heard. Does that mean that while we are fight them over there that they stop plotting on attacking the USA. What do the terrorist say at their meetings "As you know Osama the US are in Iraq so we must stop plotting until they leave, everyone lay low in your respective caves and in 10 years when the Americans leave Iraq we will start planing again" Give me a break we have no business in the middle east except Oil business but they can say that so they say we are fighting them over there so we don't have to fight them over here. Would we be more safe if we invested the billions of dollars in Iraq to securing our home front and technology and intelligence and funding special operations with organization like the Navy Seals breaking up terrorist cell over there. The Military is made to fight other Military not insurgents that why we lose wars like Vietnam. When the enemy of the USA is living next door to you what does fighting in Iraq really do except create more terrorist?

Answer 5

There are a few other countries like Britian and Israel. But the major problem here is that America isn't going after terrorists, or wasn't anyway when the Iraq war started. There were no terrorists in Iraq, and I know there wasn't because they didn't like Saddam Hussein. Many would say that isn't true, but you must remember the kind of person Saddam Hussein was. He was in it for himself, to give himself more power, and the terrorists are trying to give more power to a religious movement (Islam), albeit in a way generally opposed by Islam (a religion of peace). The terrorists would look down on someone like Saddam Hussein.

But Bush and his team lied and said terrorists were there and they had all kinds of weapons and so on without any evidence to back it up (they just made it up). They go in and destroy any semblance of government. This deal also gave terrorists a banner to march to and a cause to fight for. While terrorists weren't in Iraq, they are flowing there now by the hundreds and gaining new members all the time among Iraqis who feel their country has been invaded and is now occupied by America (so now they see themselves as protectors from a country bent on empire and martyrs to protecting their own country). That makes them heroes in their own mind, and a danger to us we caused ourselves.

That is why America has so much trouble getting other countries to help, America should fight terrorism, but no one sees them as fighting terrorism. The other countries see America as using terrorism as a cover for empire-building.

Answer 6

Is death better than life? Because if you start truly believing that violence is the answer, then you are no better than a terrorist. Violence and war are so much a part of the middle east the only way to stop them or slow them down is to lead by example. Humankind and the middle east will never grow if they can not grow beyond their differences, more terror does not fight terror history proves that.

Answer 7

perhaps you should consider why these people hate the US. the US needs to be accountable for it's actions too. perhaps the militants, sick of the hippocracy, have decided to make the US accoutable through violence. the question then is, should there be a violent retalition from the US who is actually the cause of the problem in the first place? it is the US that needs a culture change.
it's gotta end somewhere... and with so many people with your egotistical ignorant attitude, it is likely to end in the pit of hell.

Answer 8

i think all the countries understood what the United States was saying before, but everyone now thinks that we took it a little too far. I don't disagree with them, either. America thinks it's the ****, and that's really annoying. they go around sticking their butts in everyone's business like being super power labels them supreme and invincible. the fact is that there have been religious wars before, and, like all wars, the TWO countries in conflict settle the conflict BY THEMSELVES. we try to act like the buffer when in reality (behind the scenes, of course), we're actually the catalyst.

it also doesn't hurt to say that our president is a big-headed moron.

Answer 9

I think Israel has it figured out pretty well. Unfortunately, most of the world would rather that Israel didn't exist, and the US 'mind its own business'. Of course, every time we do, the world ends up biting us in the @ss...

Answer 10

Is there a need for the killings? It's war, and who needs that? What the US should invest in, is lowering seniors in nursing homes' taxes.