English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Why did the building fall perfectly even though there was no damage? The video of the building falling is very creepy and suspicious....

2006-08-01 01:51:31 · 10 answers · asked by Sabin 1 in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

10 answers

This is a good time to be examining the collapse of the towers, because we are finally starting to get some cold hard evidence, that show us, how those buildings came down. Here is some of the most recent irrefutable evidence available today.

1. We now have eye witness accounts, from people inside of the building, telling of explosions taking place, on different floors, including lower floors, just before the buildings went down. Many of the witnesses, were silenced when the buildings collapsed, but their accounts live on, in just released radio recordings. (I'll try to find them on the Internet for you. I heard the firemens radio conversations, not to long ago.) They went something like this, "What's going on! I'm on the 22nd floor, and I just heard an explosion." "I'm on 72, and I heard one too."

2. Photographs of the buildings, just before it went down, show molten metal flowing out, from the building. Structural steel requires temperatures, well beyond burning jet fuel, to melt. Further, the color of the glowing molten metal, is also representative of high temperatures, beyond that of burning jet fuel. See source below, for detailed information, regarding structural steel melting points etc.

3. A chemical analysis of the molten metal, found at the site, shows traces of a chemical called, "Thermate". Thermate charges are used by professional demolition crews, to cut through steel beams, to demolish buildings. Incidentally, the samples were recovered by a member, of the clean up crew, who kept it as a souvenir memento. Most of the scrap metal, including the pools of molten steel, were recovered by a demolition crew, and discarded. There are though photos, at ground zero, showing beams that have been shearded at a right angle: Slag is shown dripping from the process. Click on photo, in website below; for a close up examination.
http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2006/06/341238.shtml
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-2842384983834100001

4. Thermate traces have also been found, inside the bodies, of those exposed to the gases from the molten debris; people such as firemen and clean up crew members.

I found the following video clip, while conducting research. It has a bias slant, but is also very intriguing. Once you see it, you'll never be able to see the 9-ll tragedy the same again: I know I won't.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=1519312457137943386&q=loose+change

2006-08-01 11:40:32 · answer #1 · answered by Joe_Pardy 5 · 3 1

It is creepy and if you think that building feel because of a fire your on crack. In the history of man kind only three sky scrapers have fallen due to fire WTC 1, 2, and 7. Creepy is not the word it is unforgivable, inconceivable, monstrous. Building 7 was kept so far out of the media that my stepfather who used to live in Long Island did not even know there was a Building 7 till I showed it being demolished on Google Video. Every time I show people building 7 going down they all think that this could not be done with out explosives. It is just imposable for a building like that to fall straight down to ground by a mysterious fire that started inside the building. How the hell did a fire start inside the building anyway. BullShi* 9/11 was a set up

2006-08-01 02:05:55 · answer #2 · answered by DEEJay 4 · 1 0

I believe it was brought down by our own government (to have a reason to go after Bin Laden and Iraq) just like the two buildings which were hit by the planes. Jet fuel does not burn hot enough to melt steel. And eye witnesses heard and saw explosions going off in the two towers which were hit and fell and in Building 7 which was NOT hit but fell anyway. And they all fell as if they were imploded, not like they toppled over from being hit by anything.

2006-08-01 02:00:20 · answer #3 · answered by Cyndie 6 · 2 0

You mean the building that housed government documents? Demolished by explosives. No more proof of anything. Got to love the feds.

2006-08-01 02:12:02 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Extermely good engineering. No damage? Two airplanes filled with fuel don't cause damage? Are you just stupid, or are you trying to make a point?

2006-08-01 01:57:16 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

no damage? are you insane? a plane hit it!

Quit listening to those conspiracy theories on the web, and get outside and breathe some fresh air.

The jet fuel from the planes burned so hot it melted the steel, causing it to collapse, creating a domino affect.

2006-08-01 01:59:35 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 4

It was involved in a planned demolition.

2006-08-01 01:57:45 · answer #7 · answered by 2BaD4u 4 · 1 0

falling debris weekened the structural integrity.

2006-08-01 02:01:57 · answer #8 · answered by battle-ax 6 · 0 2

because, if you cut a branch of a tree, the whole tree will break down...

2006-08-01 02:38:53 · answer #9 · answered by kolobok 2 · 0 0

actuall, it was damaged, and they knew that it was going to fall, jsut not quite when....they cleared out everyone, and did not allow any one back in.....sometimes a cigar is jsut a cigar.....quit making it something it isn't....

2006-08-01 02:07:32 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

fedest.com, questions and answers