What was the cause of the BIG BANG? Just give this a guess atleast.Please Answer.I beg you u guys!!!!!!!!!?

Question

People tell the time,space matter bla bla came into existence only after big bang.My question is what is that thing that made it to occur?Give some facts on BIG BANG not fiction!!!!

Lets make it fun!!!!! you may give fictions also.Mention if it is a fiction cause i cannot differ it

Answer 1

the big bang...


what kind of porno question is this?



shouldn't you be reading books instead of discussing one big effing orgy?

Answer 2

The Big Bang theory doesn’t say anything about what caused it because, well, it doesn’t need to. Theories don’t try to explain everything, just what evidence is available and pertinent. Asking the Big Bang (and Evolution) to do more than this is a double standard. After all, the theory of Gravity doesn’t explain where mass came from. The Germ theory of disease transmission doesn’t explain where germs came from. Electro-magnetic theories don’t explain where charge comes from. Atomic theory doesn’t state where atoms come from.

So while it might seem like a piece of the puzzle is missing, as far as this single theory is concerned, it’s not really important. The origin of all these other pieces requires separate theories, with their own evidence, which are being worked on, but often times, are still in their infancy (ie, brane theory to explain the precursors to the Big Bang, Abiogenesis to explain the first life…)

Additionally, the Big Bang doesn’t go all the way back because it really can’t. When you start going back to far, things become fuzzy. The physical laws we’re all familiar with start to break down under such high energy densities. Really weird stuff starts to happen, like different fundamental forces ceasing to exist and merging with one another.

Thanks to work in particle accelerators, which can recreate such high energy densities for brief fractions of a second, we’re starting to get a feel for how physical laws operate under these conditions, and thus, are slowly working our way backwards. But there comes a point where we just don’t have a good enough handle on things to be able to say how things work back to pretty early (10-35 seconds), but things were happening so fast and furiously, there’s still a long ways to go before we can uncover what happened to cause the whole mess.

Perhaps as better particle accelerators come on line, we’ll be able to work back even further, but this will require new theories about how matter and energy behave when shoved that close together, including a theory which has proved difficult for nearly a century, describing how gravity fits in with the other three fundamental forces into something known as the Grand Unified Theory (GUT).

Answer 3

The Big Bang was caused by an exploding pulsar star. ( fiction ) now....what I have read and i belive is true, is that the moon was a large chunk of this Big bang and came sceaming at a dead planet we now call Earth. it is believed by some that it hit the planet somewhere near green land ( the plant has suvere scars there where something hit it very hard not once but twice !! ) It Hit the earth spinning it into rotation and then the gravity of the Earth pulled it back in where it hit for a second time then bounceing into our orbit. the gravity of the moon pulled in all the dust and dibree forming the moon.

This is all a theroy I have read...I dont see why it couldnt be true..do you?

Answer 4

First let us firmly resolve that there is the Creator. All material came into being by the word of the Creator. These material things statrted from a vibration. A supernova becoming a dying star is an example of a big bang. The death of a star means the coming into life the planets, meteors, moons, comets, and the like that make up the members of a solar system.

Answer 5

There are many differing views.

MAss and energy has always existed and will always exist and in the same essnetial quantity (boy, that sounds like the defintion of God, something that always was and always will be).

Religion says God Willed it.

Science say the mass accumulated due to gravity and gravity wells. Black holes maybe. Or just mass attraction. Hydrogen becomes complex molecules, which become complex matter, which become a large unstable mass which goes critical (like an A bomb) and POOF, Big Bang.

The black hole theory is that it attracks mass until the same thing happens. Cricitcal mass is reached and POOF.

What happens is is all MASS (accumulation of Hydrogen or bonding to a black hole) attracts other mass. It sucks it in. Atoms get attracked to other athoms and eventually you get this big ball of atoms and once your reach a point nuclear fusion or fission occurs and BANG!

Of course there is also the Steady State theory, which says the Universe was always this way and just keeps going like the Enegizer Bunny.

Answer 6

See basically it is believed that somewhere around 15 billion yrs or so all the matter in space was concentrated into one single point or more scientifically " the singularity" . At one stage the force of repulsion became so great that there occured a huge cosmic nuclear bomb which is called by the term that Fred Hoyle coined-Big Bang. for more information read A brief History of Time-Stephen Hawkings

Answer 7

There are two reasons:

A. It was the instability of energy that caused it. Everything finds a way to be in balance all the time, like water finds its own level, etc., etc. Energy had to manifest itself, it could not be contained within itself. So it blasted out, trying to discover balance.

B. You are the reason for the Big Bang, because if you really DON'T acknowledge it, it never happened. The whole universe exists because we acknowledge it. SO - is the universe still there when we're asleep? How can you be sure?

Answer 8

If u want to know wht created Universe do read this wht I have written.
Yes I Know ,But it is in accordance to M-Theory which is the only theory tht tells abt the cause of Big bang.
M-Theory of the Universe: Explaining the Big Bang

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I saw a startling new theory on the Creation of the Universe yesterday. For wuite a while now, the Super String theory physicists have been fighting with the 11th Dimensionalists. Unfortunately, neither theory was quite right.

The answer? They got together and everything fit perfectly! 11th dimensional strings!

The thing that confused everyone the most was the weakness of gravity. Think about it: a glass of water on a table is being pull down by the entire gravity of the whole planet Earth. Yet you can lift it easily, overcoming all of Earth's gravity.

Why are atomic forces so strong, (think nuclear explosion) yet gravity is so weak?

The answer seems to be that gravity is very strong, in it's home Universe, it's just weak by the time it gets to us.

This theory supports a bunch, if not an infinite amount of alternate Universes. Check here:

http://www.damtp.cam.ac.uk/user/gr/public/qg_ss.html

And this also helps:

This is no easy job, of course, and the explanation provided is not intended to be definitive, but offer one view, and be thought provoking. It appeals to string theory, as explained in the previous article.

String theory appeals to 11 Dimensions presently, as opposed to our traditional view of 3D space: up-down, left-right, in-out; or 4D if we include a time dimension.

Originally string theory (from here on, ST) had 10 Dimensions, but this resulted in many string theories, and the introduction of 11th Dimension reduced these all to the same one. This 11th dimension is infinitely long but very, very small across.

In this theory, a membrane stretches across the universe from one side to the other, a giant structure. Oor whole universe is a membrane. This idea might explain the big bang.

Gravity had always been a bit of a mystery - why was it so weak? It may not appear to be, but it is if you think about it. For instance, magnetism is very strong - if you take a tiny magnet, and a small pin, it will drag the pin to it from a fair distance. Yet the entire earth cannot stop us jumping or lifting objects with its weak gravitational force. It doesn't suck us in. Why is it so weak?

To answer this, appeal is made to the 11th dimension. If, in here, there is another membrane which is leaking gravity to our universe, then it can explain our gravity. It is a feint signal emanating from this other universe. So, in order to explain gravity, an appeal to a parallel universe is made, which were traditionally rubbished and avoided, at least, by respectable physicists.

These parallel universes, with their respective membranes, may be completely different - others will have life. If there are an infinity of such universes, then some have said that this means there will be an infinity of universes that contain life (though this is a fallacious argument - for instance if no other combination of constants could logically possibly create life then no other universes will contain life).

So this 11th dimension now sounds very strange - it is full of these other membrane universes; it is a multiverse. HOw can it explain everything - including one of the fundamental questions - the singularity that is said to have led to the Big Bang (which was neither Big nor a Bang, a bit of a misnomer there!)

To do this, we need to think of waves. This 11th dimension is turbulent, with universes moving through it. Sometimes they move apart, other times they collide, crashing into each other like huge waves. Membrane collisions could cause a big bang. The big bang would be the aftermath of the ecounter of the two parallel universes. But how could such a collision create the world that we know, with its stars and galaxies in clumps and clusters?

To do this, we look at the properties of the membrane, and if we drop the assumption that they are flat and perfect, but rather rippled then we can answer the question. Where the two membranes meet, they are not perfectly aligned, but two waves out of sync, and these ripples produce the clumps of matter. Therefore as an explanation of the birth of the universe, this theory seems acceptable.

In fact, we can take the laws of physics back on before the birth of the universe, back before the big bang and through the other side, which means that there was time before the big bang, where changes took place to a different world.

The singularity problem disappears. This radically new suggestion means that Einsteins' missing theory is found, and we have something approximating to a theory of everything. Membrane theory, then, could explain everything.

Of course, if this is the case, then it is a bitter sweet victory; for it means that we are nothing special. Rather, there is an infinity of membranes out there in the multiverse, many rather like ours no doubt, though we do not exist in them (certainly on conventional views of personal identity - that what it takes to be person x at time t, and the same person x at t2). So, big bangs may be occurring all of the time. Our universe co-exists with many others; we are merely one bubble floating in an ocean of other bubbles.
__________________
All the world's a stage and the men and women merely players...Shakespeare
Friends

Answer 9

There is a theory that the universe follows a cyclical path, so perhaps the big bang was a result of the big crunch which ended a previous incarnation of the universe. And when our niverse reaches its peak the it will cease expanding and start contracting until it forms another singularity and them BAM, another big bang, another universe with infinite possibilities.....

Answer 10

This is completely hypothetical... For those who believe string theory has potential, string theorists believe the big bang comes from the clashing of universes. There is A LOT more to it, but I severely dumbed it down to a short sentence.

Answer 11

The entire universe was in fact sneezed out of a being known as the great green arkle sizer. The universe will end upon the coming of the great white hanker chief.