English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

If you are convinced, what proofs do u have other than word of Media and word of Bush and his lovers? Do u have one concrete proof? If u dont have it, and u believe Bush has it, why has he kept it hidden from us?

Have you seen the documentary 'In plane sight' ? It has video evidences proving that it was all a set up. After seeing this can you trust the media again? Can u trust the government again?

2006-08-01 01:32:57 · 23 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

23 answers

What I wonder is, how many people answering questions on here work for the US Government? I mean really, those first two responses were from Can #6, or was that Can #7?

Only a brain dead moron or a co-conspirator would believe the official government story. Face it, Bush was behind 9/11. And there is plenty of evidence to prove it. Just click this link: http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=1519312457137943386

And to those who claim the "video footage" of Osama admitting to doing 9/11, well, isn't that funny!!!??? Your POOR QUALITY video footage is good enough to justify launching attacks on nations, but the facts, easily identifiable facts, presented in Loose Change and other anti-BushCo videos are "whacky!!!!" You just have to sit back and laugh, and then you have to get mad and do something about it.

Spread the word to EVERYONE you know. Tell them about the Loose Change Video. You can find it on VIDEO.GOOGLE.COM

2006-08-01 01:41:40 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

We are convinced that Usama bin Laden was responsible for planning the attacks on the World Trade Centers because he confessed on video and others confessed to assisting him. I do not know of a single responsible individual in any country who does not believe this.

Remember that there will always be conspiracy theories. Just look at the proliferation of JFK (president John Kennedy) assassination scenarios. There are still questions about the MLK (Martin Luther King) and RFK (Robert Kennedy) murders, the assassination of Archduke Ferdinand in 1914 in Sarajevo that started WWI, or the murders of Czar Nicholas II and his family in Russia in 1918, the death of Jesus Christ on the cross, etc. I could go on virtually forever. It appears the more important the event and the more distant in time the less we appear to know about it.

However, rather get wrapped around the axle of perpetual conspiracy theorizing, I think what we must all do is weigh the overwhelming preponderance of evidence and draw the appropriate conclusion while keeping an open mind to the potential for new strong refuting evidence. So far that has not happened in the World Trade Center situation, the silly documentary you refer to has been debunked in many ways by many individuals.

I think the larger question is why you seem so intent on trying to prove UBL was not responsible for this horrible act. That indicates a strong bias that may cloud your objectivity. Your railings against Bush, the media and the government are sad paranoid rantings that will not gain you many friends or supporters in the non-muslim world. If you are really going to enjoy your life and make it important you should deeply re-evaluate your belief systems and make some important changes, or you may end up exactly as you are now: frustrated, confused, unhappy and existing in a fantasy world.

2006-08-01 02:13:24 · answer #2 · answered by Answers1 6 · 0 0

I have a hard time believing that four planes can go off course and not be intercepted by the Air Force or Navy Jet fighters. As soon as one plan goes off course there are alerts that let air traffic control know that the plane is off course. Air traffic control must contact the plane and establish contact with the pilot and if contact can not be made then air traffic control must get in touch with the Pentagon. The Pentagon has 10 Min's to scrabble F-18's. You do not need the presidents orders to Scrabble the jets you only need his orders to shoot down the jets. I think it is very odd that a plan off course for 70 min could reach Washington D.C. Air Space which is supposed to be the most heavily guarded Air space in the world and do an impossible crash into the most important military building in the world with out the aid of our own government. I can not trust this government with these facts out in the open and I used to work for the government.

2006-08-01 01:46:11 · answer #3 · answered by DEEJay 4 · 0 0

Friend, Over the past 5 years, we had enough! due to twin tower bombing at New York. Concrete proofs are already melted and became steel rolls!

No media was present while the first tower was hit. Before the second tower was hit some shots were taken live.

No answer to any of the doubts that an ordinary man gets! Directly the suspesion came on the Islamic terrrorist groups due to their earlier anti US activities. On cross checking several matters, the American finger was pointing at Islamic terrorists!

2006-08-01 01:41:37 · answer #4 · answered by SESHADRI K 6 · 0 0

Some people just can't get through the day without a consipiracy theory. Who are you saying was behind the attacks? If it was Bush they'd have made a better job of tying it ti Saddam than they did, but he's been proved to have no part in it at all. I'm no admirer of the Bush Administration but the only blame to lay at their feet for the WTC attacks is that they were too incompetent to note the intelligence that indicated that such an attack was likely.

2006-08-01 01:39:35 · answer #5 · answered by Bad Liberal 7 · 0 0

What is the "World Trade Centre"? The building that I used to work in here in New York that I do believe Bin Laden was behind the attacks of was called the "World Trade Center". Although its not proof that he was behind the attacks, I can trust my own eyes that I saw commercial jets fly into the towers. I don't need to watch a video made by some wack job.

2006-08-01 01:38:10 · answer #6 · answered by Garth 6 · 0 0

I'm pretty certain that he did, but I do think there's a real chance that it was instead orchestrated by the American far right, who of course were the ones who had the most to gain, and who in fact did gain the most from the attack. If you strictly believe that old "follow the money" rule, it points directly to the American far right wing as the culprits.

I don't think that there's any chance at all though that Bush knew anything about it personally. He simply isn't bright enough to be included in a plot like that. If you were plotting against the American people, would you trust him with your secrets?

2006-08-01 01:39:40 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

to some volume, sure. My husband works the Chicago Marathon each and every 12 months, and he commented very last evening that if he'd been doing an identical pastime in Boston, he ought to were properly in the position of the explosions. for sure this delivered homestead the reality of the attack in a fashion no longer something else ought to have, and it is made me worried about the prospect of a copycat attack in October, at the same time as the Chicago Marathon will be run. besides, I once said as Boston homestead and recognize the area the position the explosions befell rather properly. I lived close by and used to bypass out to cheer on the Marathon runners each and every Patriots' Day. That, too, made the shape better genuine to me. even if, I knew someone who died on 9/11, and as undesirable as this tragedy is, it pales in evaluation, even if no longer, I understand, for the loved ones of the lifeless and significantly wounded. as well, my instincts are telling me that this develop into no longer an attack with suggestions from overseas terrorists yet fairly the artwork of a homegrown nutcase. That by some skill places a diverse complexion on the remember, even if for sure i ought to correctly be completely incorrect.

2016-11-27 05:44:01 · answer #8 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Yes, he did the attacks....how about the fact that he admitted doing the attacks, and was proud of it, and gloated even.....would that be good enough for you, or was he lying about that, and that was a setup also?

It does not ahve evidence of anything, it is theory, there is a difference.....No I can't trust media...that is why I do not trust that documentary, it was done by people of the media....so, apparently you are going to trust the media on things you want, and yell they are liars when it doesn't libe with your beliefs

2006-08-01 02:12:12 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

How you seen the video of Osama Bin Laden admitting to and taking full credit for the September 11th 2001 attacks?

That's your proof.

If you think there is some hidden American conspiracy behind the scenes, you're just a paranoid nutcase!

2006-08-01 01:38:09 · answer #10 · answered by crazyotto65 5 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers